CNN is Part of a World Awash in Lies. What Can You Believe In?
Lies, lies and more lies that are what we have discovered CNN is pedaling on its purported news broadcasts. And it is not just that they have abandoned all the canons of journalistic ethics. It used to be that no self-respecting reporter who served in any capacity would turn in a story unless there were two credible sources they were relying upon. It is of note that this standard was rooted in the Biblical Law that required a minimum of two witnesses in a capital case for a conviction to be reached. What we see at CNN and many other news outlets today is a wholesale rejection of that Biblical standard.
The evidence now is that the entire Trump – Russia collusion narrative was made up merely to boost ratings and that they all knew they were lying. Now many people are saying, so what, what harm has been done? A great deal of harm as this false narrative has pushed two super powers toward launching a deadly new war. And there is so much more damage that has been done by their continuing fake news.
Another example of their bias was revealed in a Harvard Study showing that CNN’s coverage of President Trump is 93% negative. Is this objective journalism?
“While CNN president Jeff Zucker says that viewers trust his network “more than ever,” now there’s even less reason to do so. In the wake of CNN’s recent scandal, in which it was caught knowingly peddling fake news, it now has done it again, presenting on air a fake National Enquirer cover as real…
CNN is, however, supposedly taking the matter seriously, referring it the network’s standards and practices department.
Observers may wonder if this department had previously been in mothballs — or what kind of standards it suggests — given the recent CNN journalistic fraud exposed by investigative organization Project Veritas (PV). First a CNN producer, John Bonifield, was caught on hidden camera admitting that the Russia-Donald Trump narrative is “mostly [expletive deleted]right now” and that “we don’t have any big giant proof” Next to make an appearance was CNN political commentator, former Obama administration official and avowed communist Van Jones. He confessed to an undercover PV reporter that the “Russia thing is just a big fat nothing burger” and that the network was just covering it to make money for “ratings.” Then there was “Jimmy Carr, associate producer for CNN’s New Day, admitting that CNN has a left-leaning bias and hates President Trump. He also says that American voters are ‘stupid as [expletive deleted].’ Furthermore, the video shows that CNN practices selective editing to promote a false narrative.”
Needless to say, these revelations have hurt CNN’s ratings and further damaged its credibility. Yet an important factor is underemphasized: If CNN knew the Russia story was a hoax — something [others]have been reporting for a long time — other leftist media (virtually all the media), such as the Washington Post, New York Times, USA Today and Chicago Tribune, also must have known.
Yet, they all had been exploiting the story, apparently as guilty as CNN.
This is no small matter. The Trump-Russia-collusion lie convinced millions of Americans that the election had been “stolen” from their candidate, contributing to the intense anger that sparked rioting, vandalism, attacks on Trump supporters and the June 14 attempted assassination of 10 percent of Republican congressmen by Bernie Sanders supporter James Hodgkinson. It has literally torn the country apart.
So while the New York Post cleverly dubbed CNN “THE MOST BUSTED NAME IN NEWS,” a play on the network’s slogan, the only thing distinguishing CNN from the rest of the establishment media is that it got caught red-handed peddling Red propaganda.”
And the problem goes much deeper than the fake journalists that are everywhere. What about all the fake science that is paraded before the public? What about the so called global warming caused by man’s activities on earth? “The leaking of over 1,000 emails, computer code sets, and other documents from the University of East Anglia Climatic Research Unit (CRU) back in November of 2009. The leaks revealed a network of corruption and fraud on the part of climate scientists. Such was the depths of the scandal that the event came to be known as “Climategate.”
Much (but still not enough) has been written in detail about Climategate. The gist of it, however, is that climate scientists had been cooking their data in order to support their preconceived conclusions. They had been guilty of practicing fake science in order to show both that global warming was a crisis and that anthropogenic (“man-made”) global warming was occurring.
“Global warming” was now tainted because of its association with Climategate.” So what did the fake science promoters do? They changed the label to Climate Change. Duh, the weather changes all the time, the honest climatologists, if you can find one, will show you the history of ice ages, and warming periods throughout the history of mankind. No news in the fact that Climate Changes. When you scratch the surface of this lie, you discover it is really about the governments of the world coming together in an one world government that has far reaching control and regulation of every human activity on the planet. You could call it fascism on steroids.
Other fake science is taught in every class room in America – evolution. The notion that nothing produced something and that rocks evolved into human beings, nonlife producing living beings.
Consider what is still presented in ‘science’ text books Ernst Haeckel’s popular quote: “Ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny” with Haeckel’s fraudulent pictures that are supposed to prove the point that human’s growing in their mother’s wombs replay the entire evolutionary history of humanity as they move towards the day of their birth. By the way, this is the reason many say it is perfectly justifiable to kill that baby when it is in the so called fish stage, because it is not yet a human being. But turns out the Haeckel’s drawing were a fraud, that he manufactured “pictures to prove what he wished were true, though he knew and admitted that it was not…The claim that “ontogeny recapitulates phylogeny” is false… it does not fit the fossil record and is inconsistent with any logic. Complex organisms cannot develop by accident any more than the words on this page could accidentally be formed from random arrangements of letters. But because “evolution” is presented to students and to the public as indisputable fact, supported by many who have believed the propaganda, recapitulation theory remains a tool for education, a visually appealing bit of manufactured evidence, and a paleontological mythology.” Haeckel’s “theory” simply does not meet those facts. Yet it is daily presented as science to millions of gullible students who trust their teachers to tell them the truth.
In a world awash in lies there is a trustworthy source—Titus 3:8 “This is a faithful saying, and these things I will that thou affirm constantly, that they which have believed in God might be careful to maintain good works. These things are good and profitable unto men.”
The Word of God is faithful in every way – the word faithful here translates the Greek word “pistos” which means trusty, faithful – 1st of persons who show themselves faithful in the transaction of business, the execution of commands, or the discharge of official duties – 2nd one who kept his plighted faith, worthy of trust- 3rd that can be relied on.” The God whom we worship is all of that and more.
Learn more about your Constitution with Pastor David Whitney and the “Institute on the Constitution” and receive your free gift.
Article by Daivd Whitney