Alabama: Police Officer Shoots Hero In The Back For Trying To Stop Mass Shooting – No Charges
Editor’s Note: Let me just say that in concealed carry class we learned that if you go into a situation where you don’t know everything that went on previously to determine who the good guy is and who the bad guy is, and you open fire, you are responsible for those actions. It doesn’t appear that Alabama takes things that seriously when it comes to things like this.
Hoover, AL — On Thanksgiving night, an armed assailant opened fire inside an Alabama shopping mall, shooting an 18-year-old male and a 12-year-old girl. Shortly after the shots rang out, a Hoover police officer engaged a man with a gun, opened fire, shot him in the back multiple times and killed him. Police then released a statement championing their officer and patting themselves on the back for stopping a potential mass shooting. But the man they shot was not the shooter—he was the hero trying to stop him.
Now, authorities in Alabama have just announced that they will not be charging the officer who killed this innocent man.
Alabama Attorney General Steve Marshall released a 26-page report concluding that the officer was “justified and not criminal” in fatally shooting Emantic Fitzgerald Bradford Jr., “who was running toward the initial shooter and victim with a firearm visibly in hand,” NPR reported.
“A reasonable person could have assumed that the only person with a gun who was running toward the victim of a shooting that occurred just three seconds earlier fired the shots,” the report concludes.
While this may be true, Bradford was not shooting, was not pointing the gun, and he was shot in the back as he ran after the real shooter.
Holding no punches, Bradford’s father let the court have it after they came to this decision.
“My son was murdered. And you think I’m going to let it go?” said Emantic Bradford Sr. as quoted by AL.com. “That was a homicide … you killed my son. You are a coward. You’re a coward too, Steve Marshall.”
As TFTP reported at the time, this case was swarmed in controversy as police originally claimed to have killed the shooter. But they actually killed the hero and let the shooter go.
Originally, after the still-unidentified officer shot Bradford Jr., police issued the following statement describing what happened.
“…two males engaged in a physical altercation on the second floor concourse area of the Riverchase Galleria, near the entrance to the Footaction. During the fight, one of the males produced a handgun and shot the other male twice in the torso. Two uniformed Hover Police officers providing security at the mall were in close proximity and heard the gunshots. While moving toward the shooting scene, one of the officers encountered a suspect brandishing a pistol and shot him. That individual, a 21-year-old male from Hueytown, was pronounced dead at the scene.”
After this original statement, however, police were forced to retract it and quickly issued an update. Authorities initially said Bradford, known as E.J., was the shooter—but he was not.
Late that night, after they already assassinated his character, police changed their story, saying that while Bradford was involved in “some aspect of the altercation” and was armed with a handgun, he likely did not fire the rounds that injured the two others.
“We regret that our initial media release was not totally accurate, but new evidence indicates that it was not,” Hoover police spokesman Capt. Gregg Rector said.
The police were forced to issue the retraction so quickly, not in the name of transparency, but for the public’s safety because the real gunman was still at large.
“Not only did they assassinate his person but they truly assassinated his character,” high profile attorney Benjamin Crump said at a news conference. “[The officer] saw a black man with a gun and he made his determination that he must be a criminal.”
According to Crump, Bradford was standing over the wounded 18-year-old victim, trying to defuse the situation when police shot first and “asked questions later because he was a black man.”
As ABC news reported at the time, Crump said Bradford was carrying a handgun but was licensed to do so. Alabama is an “open carry” state, meaning he did not require a permit to openly carry the handgun, as long as it was holstered.
Bradford was honorably discharged from the Army due to an injury, according to his parents, who clutched a photo of him in uniform during an interview with ABC News.
This case was similar to a story from the same month in which a “good guy with a gun” was killed by police. The tragedy unfolded in November after a hero security guard stopped what was quickly becoming a deadly mass shooting, only to be shot by police moments later police. Jemel Roberson, 26, was working security at a local night club when his heroism got him killed.
In both cases, the NRA has remained entirely silent. Shameful indeed.
Article posted with permission from The Free Thought Project