With what has just happened in France, it is a good time to become educated about informed consent.  Natural News reported “The French government just passed a law to fine and imprison people for refusing to get injected with mRNA (modRNA) ‘vaccines.'”

All opposition to mRNA-LNP (lipid nanoparticles) injections in France is now considered to be “sectarian aberration.” Violations carry with them a penalty of 45,000 euros and up to three years imprisonment.

“It will not tolerate any criticism of the therapeutic treatments which will be recommended or made obligatory by the state,” tweeted Dr. Kat Lindley. “Any person who dares to openly criticize these therapies will be liable to fines and imprisonment.”

Known as Article 4, the highly illiberal law prohibits residents and citizens from saying anything bad about “therapeutic” treatments like mRNA shots that are either mandatory or just recommended by the French government.

“Already, renowned doctors are being targeted, whom this article will silence,” said a French X account called Annie Arnaud. “France is taking a totalitarian run. Macron and his henchmen are followers of the WEF (World Economic Forum) and globalist policies.”

“It is a catastrophe for the country where a majority of citizens no longer obey vaccine propaganda. Social unrest ahead.”

While this is a basic eradication of the right to freedom of speech, it carries over into the realm of informed consent. How so?

When visiting a physician, regardless of setting, and you begin to ask questions, as is your right in giving/denying informed consent, would your hesitation or criticism of the product (injection, device, drug) the physician recommends that is either “mandated” or recommended by the government be considered as open “sectarian aberration”?

In the united States, the 21st Century Cures Act allows what is known as “real world evidence ” (RWE) to be used for post approval studies.

• “Presumably, this legislation is having an impact; however, we don’t know of any data to support that at this time. The 21st Century Cures Act modified the FDA drug approval process. The intention is to expedite the process by easing the requirements on drug companies seeking FDA approval for new products, or for new indications for existing products. For example, under certain conditions, the act allows companies to provide “data summaries” and “real-world evidence” — such as observational studies, insurance claims data, patient input, pragmatic trials, and anecdotal data — rather than full, traditional randomized clinical trial results.  This legislation was strongly supported by the pharmaceutical industry and essentially requires FDA to accept these approaches, necessitating greater understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, and appropriate analytical methods needed to make informed decisions.” – Haley Kaplowitz, Ph.D., executive director, safety, epidemiology, registries, and risk management, UBC.

According to Dr. Kaplowitz, it is possible that your medical records could be used in one of these “approval” processes, without your knowledge or consent, to expand the indications for existing products. Now, facilities require your approval to share your medical records with an outside party. When you sign the informed consent form, you are giving approval for your records to be shared with insurance companies for reimbursement. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) can then access the insurance company data to use in these “clinical trials” without your specific informed consent.

Under this 21st Century Cures Act, the FDA and pharmaceutical companies to extract data from various sources mentioned above to expand the use of products without requiring you to provide specific informed consent. You could become a participant in a “clinical trial” without even knowing it.

What does this have to do with the “law” passed in France? We saw in the united States the basic removal of informed consent regarding the CONvid-1984 injections through employee mandates, some government mandates, some public health mandates, and the package insert being left “intentionally blank”. All of this done with the injection being under “emergency use authorization”, aka experimental. A vicious censorship campaign ensued where critics, those discussing the injections and mandates, and those providing accurate information regarding the injections were removed, banned, or “shadow-banned” from multiple platforms. Viewership to many sites were throttled back. It’s just a hop, skip, and a jump away from the eradication of free speech here in the US.

Notice the reference individuals made to “all mRNA-LNP (lipid nanoparticle) injections regarding the French “law”.

This is the beginning of formal medical fascism. While the world witnessed a form of “soft” medical fascism during the CONvid-1984 planned scam-demic, France has now codified formal medical fascism. The rest of the western world is not far behind when one considers the influence of the World Health Organization (WHO), the World Economic Forum (WEF), Bill Gates, and the number of bought and paid for “representatives” in governments today, as well as the revolving door between Big Pharma and “health” agencies such as the FDA and Centers for Disease Control (CDC).

In order to keep your God-given unalienable rights, you are going to have to exercise them. In order to help you exercise your right to informed consent and navigate the waters of this important right in the medical industrial complex, you can pick up a copy of my ebook “Informed Consent: An Unalienable Right” – a paperbook version will be out soon.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media