Unwanted: Pro-Life Feminists at Women’s March
There is nothing uglier than hypocrisy, especially when one condemns people for the very sin of which they are guilty – To be fighting for the rights of a group while discriminating against a subset of that group. This is the most nefarious of attitudes because the discrimination covers such a large set.
It would be like Martin Luther King Jr. only marching for Baptist Blacks. If you are Methodist or Muslim, he does not care about your rights. That would be foolish. It would prove that his movement did not care about freedom and liberty, but power. Praise God, King had no such attitude.
But some feminist apparently do.
- Activate Your Own Stem Cells & Reverse The Aging Process - Choose "Select & Save" OR Join, Brand Partner & Select Silver To Get Wholesale Prices
- Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
- How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation
- Protect Your Income & Retirement Assets With Gold & Silver
- Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Get Free Shipping With Promo Code TIM
Fox News Insider reports:
A feminist group leader said her organization was barred from participating in the Women’s March on Washington next week because their group is pro-life.
Destiny Herndon-De La Rosa, who is opposed to President Trump like many of the march’s participants, said the organizers effectively rescinded her invitation after they found out her stance on that issue.
What this means is that this group wants to speak for women. They want to bring all these groups together to have one voice. The only thing is, to be a part, you have to say exactly what they want to hear.
The organizers of the march would be the voice of every woman unless she is Pro-Life. This, once again, shows that the Left cares nothing about the rights of women or any other group in our society. What they care about is power.
Hopefully, De La Rosa will continue to advocate for women and the unborn, but now maybe she will see the hypocrisy of the left.
Article posted with permission from Constitution.com. Article by Michael Ware.