Posts Tagged
supreme court
Justice Kennedy Compares Supreme Court to Nazis
Throughout the twentieth and into the twenty-first century, hundreds of people, if not more, have used the horrors of Nazi tyranny to defame their opponents. The GOP compares the overreach of Democratic politicians to the Nazis. Liberals compare the laws according to morals of the Republicans to the Nazis. But …
AP Pushes False Narrative on Legalization of Sodomy as Pollsters Support the “Following Instructions” Narrative
The erroneous ruling of the Supreme Court contending that sodomite “marriage” is a “right” under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the united States has stirred controversy for months between supporters of the ruling and those opposed. Further controversy sparked when Rowan County, KY clerk Kim Davis refused to …
Snapping of the American Mind: Good Medicine
No, you haven’t lost your mind. Yes, America has. If someone just 20 years ago had said, for starters, that we’d someday elect an anti-American president who would intentionally flood our borders with millions of illegal immigrants and Islamist “refugees,” that we’d soon celebrate as “heroic” a former Olympic champion …
TN Lawmakers Declare Independence from Judicial Tyranny
Two Tennessee lawmakers are showing the rest of the United States the way to strike a lethal blow against the judicial tyranny of the Supreme Court. Here is how it’s done: by states with marriage amendments declaring the Court’s ruling on sodomy-based “marriage” null and void. The Constitution is utterly …
Constitution Clearly Says Judge David Bunning and Supreme Court have no Jurisdiction over Kim Davis
To paraphrase Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., I see things as they should be, and say why not? A little noticed facet of the debate over the incarceration of Kim Davis is that the Constitution itself forbids the federal judiciary from interfering with her duties in any way. The Constitution itself …
The “Taxing Clause”, Five Lawless Judges, And Obamacare
Our federal Constitution is one of enumerated powers only. This means that WE THE PEOPLE, who ordained and established the Constitution, listed therein every power We delegated to the federal government. If We didn’t list a power, the federal government doesn’t have it.1 Furthermore, we delegated only a very few …
The Lie of Separation of Church and State & the U.S. Supreme Court’s Usurpation of Power
1. How did it happen that our country became a land where Christian children are forbidden to use the word, “God”, in the public schools; public school students are forbidden to say prayers at football games; and Christian religious speech is banned from the public square? Read on, and I …
Declaration Of Independence: Do Our Rights Come from God, the Constitution, the Supreme Court, or Congress?
The future of our Posterity depends on a proper understanding of the Source of our Rights. I will explain four views; show you which one is true, and why the other three are false and lead inexorably to the destruction of any country which embraces them. 1. Let us begin with …
How to Count States’ Applications for an Article V Convention
The issue of how to count the applications from the States is confused by the practice of States to apply for “limited conventions” to propose this specific amendment or that specific amendment. So, how is Congress to count such applications? Does it need 34 applications all asking for a convention …
Rob Natelson Perverts the Necessary and Proper Clause and Thinks in Circles
In former law professor Rob Natelson’s recent paper, “No, the Necessary and Proper Clause Does NOT Empower Congress to Control an Amendments Convention” [read it HERE or HERE], he makes several untrue statements and commits the gross fallacy of making a circular argument, which begs the question. Natelson is the …