“Experts” Sing a Different Tune than Obama: Claims of “Voting Anomalies in Michigan, Wisconsin and New York”
Remember when Barack Hussein Obama Soetoro Sobarkah chastised Donald Trump for saying the elections were rigged? Remember when he said it couldn’t happen and hasn’t happened? Well, now Hillary Clinton supporting “experts” are claiming the unimaginable has happened!
Just to preface, take a look at the video clip of what Obama said.
Now, following the elections, not only do we have people attempting to flip the Electoral College for Hillary Clinton, but we even have threats made against electors, in an attempt to steal the election and override the voice of the people.
Recent news from The Daily Mail reports that so-called “experts” in computer security are claiming that the election was rigged in favor of Donald Trump in several states, including Michigan, Wisconsin and Florida. As a result, they are calling for a recount.
From the Daily Mail:
Hillary Clinton could have been robbed of the presidency by hackers, a group of experts claims – and now they’re calling for her to demand a recount.
The team, which includes voting rights experts and computer security buffs, says it has compelling evidence that Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania could have been hacked to artificially lower turnout.
They’re now pressuring the Clinton group to call for an independent recount that could swing the needle of the election in the Democrats’ favor, New York magazine reported.
According to their calculations, such a hack could have cost Clinton 30,000 votes in Wisconsin. She lost that state – and its ten Electoral College votes – by 27,000.
Michigan was too close to call with a gap of 11,000, denying Clinton its 16 Electoral College votes, and she lost Pennsylvania’s 20 Electoral College votes by 68,236.
Though there’s been no suggestion of possible culprits in the potential hacking, the DNC blamed Russia for mid-election-season hacks of Democrat email accounts.
If an independent investigation could prove hacking – and a recount granted Clinton those three states – then she would be made President after all.
Additionally, if you recall, we reported on the fact that a narrative involving Russian hacking with fraudulent documents was developed. Hillary was not robbed. She simply did not have the support the media claimed she did, and we showed you that.
The report by Mac Slavo pointed to a Reuters article, which read in part:
U.S. intelligence and law enforcement officials are warning that hackers with ties to Russia’s intelligence services could try to undermine the credibility of the presidential election by posting documents online purporting to show evidence of voter fraud.
The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said however, that the U.S. election system is so large, diffuse and antiquated that hackers would not be able to change the outcome of the Nov. 8 election.
But hackers could post documents, some of which might be falsified, that are designed to create public perceptions of widespread voter fraud, the officials said.
They said that they did not have specific evidence of such a plan, but state and local election authorities had been warned to be vigilant for hacking attempts.
So, who are we to believe here? Are we to believe these intelligence officials when they can’t even determine whether or not Hillary Clinton’s private illegal email server was hacked by whomever? Or do we believe the actual voting results?
My thought has always been that when you are using electronic voting machines, you are instantly opening yourself up to fraud. Fraud will be there no matter what, and was there even with paper ballots, but we have documented actual testimony that fraud can be conducted with electronic voting machines and no one would know it.
Voting machines are not reliable and should not be trusted. Votes should be taken in open polling places and then counted in the open before a watching public, but that will never happen unless the people rise up against the system. Remember the Battle of Athens when you are really serious about restoring the rule of law.
In the end, I don’t know what all the fuss is about. Hillary conceded the election to Trump. Reality rudely crashed in on her.