Home»Commentary»Huxley’s Ominous Letter Warning To Orwell Concerning The Dystopian Nightmare Right Before Us

Huxley’s Ominous Letter Warning To Orwell Concerning The Dystopian Nightmare Right Before Us

1
Shares
Pinterest WhatsApp

In 2014 and 2016, author Shaun Usher published two works titled Letters of Note: An Eclectic Collection of Correspondence Deserving of a Wider Audience (Historical Nonfiction Letters, Letters from Famous People, Book of Letters and Correspondance) and Letters of Note: Volume 2: An Eclectic Collection of Correspondence Deserving of a Wider Audience.  In the second volume, a letter is reprinted from Aldous Huxley, author of Brave New World to George Orwell, author of 1984.  In the letter, Huxley states that he believes the dystopian nightmare that he portrayed will win out against the dystopian nightmare of Orwell’s 1984.

Keep in mind that Huxley was Orwell’s french teacher in high school.

Here’s the letter dated October 21, 1949 from Huxley to Orwell (emphasis mine).

Wrightwood. Cal.
21 October, 1949

Dear Mr. Orwell,

It was very kind of you to tell your publishers to send me a copy of your book. It arrived as I was in the midst of a piece of work that required much reading and consulting of references; and since poor sight makes it necessary for me to ration my reading, I had to wait a long time before being able to embark on Nineteen Eighty-Four.

Agreeing with all that the critics have written of it, I need not tell you, yet once more, how fine and how profoundly important the book is. May I speak instead of the thing with which the book deals — the ultimate revolution? The first hints of a philosophy of the ultimate revolution — the revolution which lies beyond politics and economics, and which aims at total subversion of the individual’s psychology and physiology — are to be found in the Marquis de Sade, who regarded himself as the continuator, the consummator, of Robespierre and Babeuf. The philosophy of the ruling minority in Nineteen Eighty-Four is a sadism which has been carried to its logical conclusion by going beyond sex and denying it. Whether in actual fact the policy of the boot-on-the-face can go on indefinitely seems doubtful. My own belief is that the ruling oligarchy will find less arduous and wasteful ways of governing and of satisfying its lust for power, and these ways will resemble those which I described in Brave New World. I have had occasion recently to look into the history of animal magnetism and hypnotism, and have been greatly struck by the way in which, for a hundred and fifty years, the world has refused to take serious cognizance of the discoveries of Mesmer, Braid, Esdaile, and the rest.

Partly because of the prevailing materialism and partly because of prevailing respectability, nineteenth-century philosophers and men of science were not willing to investigate the odder facts of psychology for practical men, such as politicians, soldiers and policemen, to apply in the field of government. Thanks to the voluntary ignorance of our fathers, the advent of the ultimate revolution was delayed for five or six generations. Another lucky accident was Freud’s inability to hypnotize successfully and his consequent disparagement of hypnotism. This delayed the general application of hypnotism to psychiatry for at least forty years. But now psycho-analysis is being combined with hypnosis; and hypnosis has been made easy and indefinitely extensible through the use of barbiturates, which induce a hypnoid and suggestible state in even the most recalcitrant subjects.

Within the next generation I believe that the world’s rulers will discover that infant conditioning and narco-hypnosis are more efficient, as instruments of government, than clubs and prisons, and that the lust for power can be just as completely satisfied by suggesting people into loving their servitude as by flogging and kicking them into obedience. In other words, I feel that the nightmare of Nineteen Eighty-Four is destined to modulate into the nightmare of a world having more resemblance to that which I imagined in Brave New World. The change will be brought about as a result of a felt need for increased efficiency. Meanwhile, of course, there may be a large-scale biological and atomic war — in which case we shall have nightmares of other and scarcely imaginable kinds.

 

Thank you once again for the book.

Yours sincerely,

Aldous Huxley

Personally, I think there is a combination of the two books.  I think there will be much of Huxley as the majority of the masses seem to just go quietly along with whatever they are told for the sake of efficiency or convenience and the jackbooted thugs will only be needed for those pesky ones that continue to unravel the lies to expose the truth.

For a more comprehensive look at the difference between Huxley’s and Orwell’s views of the future, I recommend Amusing Ourselves To Death by Neil Postman.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


Tim Brown

Tim Brown is a Christian and lover of liberty, a husband to his "more precious than rubies" wife, father of 10 "mighty arrows" and jack of all trades. He lives in the US-Occupied State of South Carolina, is the Editor at SonsOfLibertyMedia.com, GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com. and SettingBrushfires.com; and also broadcasts on The Sons of Liberty radio weekdays at 6am EST and Saturdays at 8am EST. Follow Tim on Twitter. Also check him out on Gab, Minds, and USALife.
Previous post

Template Letter to Insurance Broker Re: Effect of All-Cause Mortality Increase on Insurance Company Credit

Next post

EXCLUSIVE - Gabby Franco: Why I Left Venezuela For The US & How Gun Control Creeps In (Video)