The Changing of Loyalties and Destruction of American Values
Forward: It must seem that I am repeating the same things over and over again. I am deliberately trying to deliver the same message because I am genuinely trying to awaken as many people as I can to what is happening in our country. Joseph Goebbels believed a lie told often enough would be accepted as truth; I am hoping that telling the truth over and over again will awaken people from the continuous lies . Nothing is as it seems in this country: you could say that we are, in a sense, being hypnotized through fear and propaganda into accepting things we don’t fully understand. In order to save our country, we have to accept that we are the targets of a psychological warfare campaign designed to change the way you feel about yourself and your country, to break down your morale so you have no idea how to defend the principles you once believed in. It is a battle for hearts and minds, and if you choose to opt out, you aid in the destruction of liberty.
Keep in mind we are being heavily censored, please follow us on our social media pages: Telegram USA.Life, Gab, Parler, Minds, Spreely, MeWe, Twitter, Facebook
You can change their loyalties by Psychopolitics. Given a short time with a Psychopolitician you can alter forever the loyalty of a soldier in our hands or a statesman or a leader in his own country, or you can destroy his mind. Lavrentiy Beria pp. 3
Things are unraveling at a rapid pace, and many are wondering if we will make it to the 2016 elections to rid ourselves of this radical madman destroying our country. Violent protests continue to erupt at Donald Trump rallies; protests which, of course, are funded by George Soros. The threat of ISIS hovers over our heads, and the attacks against our Constitution and the sovereignty of our nation continue unabated. In fact, out of fear and uncertainty, a large portion of the electorate is literally begging the government to do away with their constitutional protections to not only keep and bear arms, but to due process, as well. In very predictable fashion, our elected representatives are marching in lock step with this agenda. This is expected of the Democrats; however, the Republicans were elected to be the check and balance against Obama and they have caved on every single issue since they were given power. Are they in on the deliberate destruction of the country? Certainly some of them are; however, there is something else going on. America is being governed by people highly skilled in the Communist art of Psychopolitics, and they have ways of ensuring people remain loyal to their agenda.
“Psychopolitics: The art and science of asserting and maintaining dominion over the thoughts and loyalties of individuals, officers, bureaus and masses, and the effecting of the conquest of enemy nations through mental healing.”
What does it mean to assert and maintain the thoughts and loyalties of people? It means psychologically persuading them to go along with an agenda they may otherwise reject. Communists believe that everything should be done for the betterment of government. There is no higher power than the state; therefore, loyalty simply means alignment with state or Communist goals. Those skilled in psychopolitics employ methods that ensure those disloyal to Communist goals re-align their loyalties, knowingly or not, to assist in their agenda. Lavrentiy Beria, author of the Manual on Psychopolitics, gives an example by describing an unhealthy body part being out of alignment with the whole body. He refers to the surgical procedure as a “shock” treatment of sorts and that after surgery, the unhealthy body part is now aligned with the main body. What does this have to do with the way people think? Well, imagine if the efforts of the media and the opinions of the masses could be used as a form of shock therapy to change the loyalties of people that were supposed to be fighting for American values? That is exactly what is going on.
According to Beria, loyalties can be changed by first eradicating previous loyalties. This can be done by creating a mental association between the previous loyalty and some form of duress which is said to be caused by that loyalty. In other words, creating a panic about the second amendment, for example, and using the media to portray gun ownership as evil, coupled with the constant exposure to slaughter of helpless victims, can be a powerful motivator in realigning loyalties. Consider the following paragraph from the Manual on Psychopolitics.
There is the creation of a state of mind in the individual, by actually placing him under duress, and then furnishing him with false evidence to demonstrate that the target of his previous loyalties is, itself, the course of the duress. Another portion of the same method consists of defaming or degrading the individual whose loyalties are to be changed to the target of his loyalties, i.e. superiors or government, to such a degree that this target, at length, actually does hold the individual in disrepute, and so does rebuff him and serve to convince him that his loyalties have been misplaced. These are the milder methods but have proven to be very effective. The greatest drawback in their practice is that they require time and concentration, the manufacture of false evidence, and the psychopoltical operator’s time.
Not only is this being applied against our politicians in an effort to get the legislation they want passed, it’s being done on a national level to discredit the United States as a whole. Barack Obama has continuously blamed our Constitution for the problems we now face. Through this type of mental manipulation, we now have college students begging for the eradication of the First Amendment because free speech can be offensive, we have a once rugged, individualistic people begging the government to keep them safe, and we have politicians who swore an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution selling out because they are afraid of how it may look to support principles that are falsely being labeled as harmful to the country.
B.F. Skinner wrote in Beyond Freedom and Dignity that manipulation of the environment can be a powerful way to influence people’s behavior. He refers to the desire to be accepted and says that the fear of not being accepted can be used as a means of control. This is exactly what is going on in America. Our environment is being changed deliberately to give the impression that America, along with its founding principles, is the cause of our stress, and if we would simply realign our loyalties to fit the needs of our masters, all would be fine. Our policy makers are furnished with false evidence that suggests the masses wish to align themselves with loyalties which are contrary to the principles the nation was founded upon.
People who get along together well under the mild contingencies of approval and disapproval are controlled as effectively as (and in many ways more effectively than) the citizens of a police state. Orthodoxy controls through the establishment of rules, but the mystic is no freer because the contingencies which have shaped his behavior are more personal or idiosyncratic. Those who work productively because of the reinforcing value of what they produce are under the sensitive and powerful control of the products. Those who learn in the natural environment are under a form of control as powerful as any control exerted by a teacher. (Skinner, 91)
This is how you change a nation from one of liberty to one of servitude: you make the people beg for it by changing the environment in which they live into one of danger and uncertainty, blame it on their freedom, and offer Communism as a solution.
By psychopolitics our chief goals are effectively carried forward. To produce a maximum of chaos in the culture of the enemy is our first most important step. Our fruits are grown in chaos, distrust, economic depression and scientific turmoil. At last a weary populace can seek peace only in our offered Communist State, at last only Communism can resolve the problems of the masses. (Lavrentiy Beria, pp. 3)
Article reposted with permission from The Radical Conservative