Covid Tests: Real Or Fake?
We continue to hear all about the “Communist Chinese Wuhan virus” (Covid19), but how much of these tests are real and how much of them have been labeled as false?
Do we really know where the test for this virus came from? Do we know how the test were designed? Do we even know from what nation, lab, or scientist the tests came from? Are the tests reliable? Do they really isolate the “Communist Chinese Wuhan virus”? Has the world been played? There are so many questions so, I decided to find some answers. I will try to answer them all and I may answer all while showing who, what, where and why the tests were developed. That should obtain a few answers for those of us that have no idea where the tests were developed or when they were developed, nor do we know if they are reliable for testing the “Communist Chinese Wuhan virus” and not some viruses that may be closely related.
Let us first take a brief look at the man who came up with what is called the PCR test, which is alleged to show either a positive or negative COVID19 from the example taken. What do we know about this test? Well, this can best be summed up from an article written by KLA TV Published on February 1, 2021. The title of the article is – Christian Drosten & The Fraud Behind COVID 19 PCR Testing.
- Activate Your Own Stem Cells & Reverse The Aging Process - Choose "Select & Save" OR Join, Brand Partner & Select Silver To Get Wholesale Prices
- Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
- How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation
- Protect Your Income & Retirement Assets With Gold & Silver
- Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Get Free Shipping With Promo Code TIM
- Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
- Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
- Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
This article is a bit lengthy but I’sdsll use parts for the most information because they have another article we will show that is from American Scientests.
“The German virologist Professor Dr. Christian Drosten is THE face of the current corona crisis! The weekly magazine Stern even ran the headline in March 2020: “The coronavirus has made virologist Christian Drosten the most sought-after man in the Republic, and a star.”
For it was Christian Drosten who developed the PCR Corona test in January 2020, which from then on served as the standard method for detecting the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 worldwide. As Director of the Berlin Charité Institute, he is a very influential advisor to the German government and participated as an expert in many government press conferences.
Thus, through his assessments, he also significantly influenced far-reaching political decisions, such as the compulsory wearing of masks, the suspension of regular school lessons, or the closure of the entire catering industry.
Out of a series of awards, the Federal Cross of Merit on Ribbon in 2005 and the Federal Cross of Merit 1st Class in 2020 stand out.
In this program, however, a file in four parts is shared, which shows a completely different face of Christian Drosten and throws light on his hardly known background:”
Christian is clearly a German Virologist who designed the test for COVID 19. This test was developed in Germany and is used all over the world, but is it a correct test? We will get into that part later to show how that works out.
“The Drosten File” Part 1: Christian Drosten And His Mis-Predictions
“Due to Drosten’s awards, one should expect that his assessments and forecasts will be accurate. Here are just two examples of his always worrying forecasts compared with actual developments:
Forecast 1: 2003 / SARS
“If the epidemic cannot be pushed back in the near future, there may be repeated cases of SARS.[…] If outbreaks of such pulmonary diseases were to occur regularly in certain countries, it could have a serious impact on their economies. An effective vaccine cannot be expected for at least one to two years.”
Actual development: According to the WHO, since the beginning of the so-called SARS epidemic in 2003, there have been only 8,096 SARS cases worldwide with 774 deaths; in Germany, only 9 cases occurred and not a single death.
Forecast 2: 2009 / Swine flu
“The disease is a serious common viral infection that produces significantly more severe side effects than anyone can imagine from the worst vaccine.”
Although there was no reliable data on numbers of cases, Drosten urged people to get vaccinated against swine flu.
Actual development: The predicted epidemic never occurred. Nevertheless, vaccines were ordered by Western governments for several hundred million euros, but the vast majority of the population rejected them despite Drosten’s urgent recommendation. Moreover, the vaccines caused far more serious damage than the swine flu itself.
Conclusion: Drosten’s scary forecasts, which always aimed at the “standard solution; vaccination”, turned out to be fatal misjudgements resulting in gigantic economic damage.
How is it possible that he continues to appear credible as THE advisor to the government with these repeated horror predictions?
It seems we get a picture of a man who seemed to cry wolf when in reality it was a kitten. We could go into part 2 of the “Drosten” file but will let you read that at the site listed below.
“The Drosten File” Part 3: Christian Drosten And His PCR Test
“The PCR test for the detection of the SARS-CoV-2 virus developed by Drosten in January 2020 at lightning speed is “the test of the year”! These test results are the legitimation for national governments worldwide to enforce the most massive restrictions of fundamental rights against citizens!
As recently as 2014, Drosten said of this PCR test method: “The method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen, for example, flits across a nurse’s nasal mucosa for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously, people at death’s door were reported, now mild cases and even people without symptoms are suddenly included in the reporting statistics. This could also explain the explosion in the number of cases in Saudi Arabia. On top of this, the local media have made an incredible fuss about it.”
Doesn’t this quote from Drosten accurately reflect the current Corona situation?
“Reporting statistics suddenly include perfectly healthy people and distort them.”
“Explosion in case numbers.”
“The Media is exaggerating things beyond belief.”
This begs the question; Did Drosten design this PCR protocol in order to trigger a “case-demic”?
A recent scientific research paper by 22 top-class scientists substantiates this suspicion, as they have refuted the scientific basis of the Drosten study, which served as the test protocol adopted by the WHO.
Also, initial court decisions have confirmed the unscientific nature of the Drosten study and his PCR test.
With his unscientific study and the unfit-for-purpose test based on it, this one man has significantly steered the entire Corona scenario: Christian Drosten – Not only he himself, but also the test he developed proves to be implausible upon close examination.”
Read that above good to see that the test was seemingly tossed together quickly, but does it really detect COVID-19? We will get to that in a bit from an article written here in the US. The writers of the article here even state that it is possible that Drosten has amplified a problem that now seems to be exaggerated a good bit. Does this prove that the tests for COVID-19 were vastly exaggerated? Has the world been lied to by a person who seems to have made money from the tests?
“The Drosten File” Part 4: Christian Drosten And His Manifold Entanglements
“A decisive indicator for the credibility of scientists is their neutrality and impartiality.
- Is Drosten’s neutrality and impartiality even possible – given his connection to Olfert Landt?
Olfert Landt is one of the regular co-authors of Drosten’s studies – including the current Corona test publication. He is also the owner of the Berlin biotech company TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, which produces Corona PCR tests. Drosten and Landt have apparently discovered a successful “business model”: in the case of pandemics and the most diverse viral outbreaks, they jointly develop a PCR test for them: this was already the case in 2002/2003 for SARS, in 2011 for EHEC, in 2012 for MERS, in 2016 for the Zika virus, in 2017 for yellow fever.
Right at the start of the Corona crisis, Landt and his Berlin-based biotech company were producing Corona test kits for 1,500,000 Corona tests per week, and by February they had already tripled their sales.
In the meantime, he has probably reaped gigantic profits from these tests. It is somehow doubtful that Landt will pocket the entire economic success and that Drosten will only benefit in his reputation.”
Seeing the aforementioned connection to a company that made the test kits, one could begin to believe that maybe the tests were not as accurate as they seem to be but that the tests are just another instance of a few people getting rich off the terrible situation people were led into. With this in mind, we will now explore an article which seems to open up the idea that maybe COVID– 19 was nowhere near as bad as it was declared to be. If you wish to read the entire article about Christian Drosten, click the link below.
This next article will show why it seems that the entire world has been misled by the tests of COVID-19. This Doctor, and many others, seems to indicate that no real virus could be found with which to really make a test. Can this mean the world was shut down for reasons that seem to show that the tests were made for a profit to those who made the tests? Let us look at this article to see what is going on and where it looks to go. It is very important to read what is presented so you can make your own decisions about this and not allow the government to influence your own determination after reading what is presented.
I’m a Clinical Lab Scientist, COVID-19 Is Fake, Wake Up America!
Global Research, February 12, 2021
Prepare for Change 9 January 2021
The following statements by Dr. Derick Knauss on the identity of the virus and on the failures of the PCR test are corroborated by numerous scientific studies including the WHO. See the text by Prof. Michel Chossudovsky at the foot of Dr. Knauss’ article
I have a PhD in virology and immunology. I’m a clinical lab scientist and have tested 1500 “supposed” positive Covid 19 samples collected here in S. California. When my lab team and I did the testing through Koch’s postulates and observation under a SEM (scanning electron microscope), we found NO Covid in any of the 1500 samples.
What we found was that all of the 1500 samples were mostly Influenza A and some were influenza B, but not a single case of Covid, and we did not use the B.S. PCR test.
We then sent the remainder of the samples to Stanford, Cornell, and a few of the University of California labs and they found the same results as we did, NO COVID. They found influenza A and B. All of us then spoke to the CDC and asked for viable samples of COVID, which CDC said they could not provide as they did not have any samples. We have now come to the firm conclusion through all our research and lab work, that the COVID 19 was imaginary and fictitious.
The flu was called Covid and most of the 225,000 dead were dead through co-morbidities such as heart disease, cancer, diabetes, emphysema etc. and they then got the flu which further weakened their immune system and they died.
I have yet to find a single viable sample of Covid 19 to work with. We at the 7 universities that did the lab tests on these 1500 samples are now suing the CDC for Covid 19 fraud. the CDC has yet to send us a single viable, isolated and purifed sample of Covid 19. If they can’t or won’t send us a viable sample,
I say there is no Covid 19, it is fictitious. The four research papers that do describe the genomic extracts of the Covid 19 virus never were successful in isolating and purifying the samples. All the four papers written on Covid 19 only describe small bits of RNA which were only 37 to 40 base pairs long which is NOT A VIRUS. A viral genome is typically 30,000 to 40,000 base pairs.
With as bad as Covid is supposed to be all over the place, how come no one in any lab world wide has ever isolated and purified this virus in its entirety? That’s because they’ve never really found the virus, all they’ve ever found was small pieces of RNA which were never identified as the virus anyway.
So what we’re dealing with is just another flu strain like every year, COVID 19 does not exist and is fictitious. I believe China and the globalists orchestrated this COVID hoax (the flu disguised as a novel virus) to bring in global tyranny and a worldwide police totalitarian surveillance state, and this plot included massive election fraud to overthrow Trump.
Dr. Derek Knauss is a clinical lab specialist focussing on virology and immunology. He is based in Southern California
Here it is shown that the tests are not what they are described as doing. Even the World Health Organization seems to be in agreement with Dr. Derek Knauss. Dr. Knauss even states that no pure and singled out COVID-19 example can be produced meaning that maybe it does not exist in quantities large enough to do any real harm. But then, he goes on to mention that no COVID was found in 1,500 samples, NONE! He mentions that several universities were included in this study and they came to the very same conclusions. He even states that what was found were viruses of the flu strains we already have, but not a single case of COVID. Let us look at what Prof Michel Chossudovsky states.
“False Positives” and the Identification of the Virus
Excerpt from Prof. Michel Chossudovsky’s E-Book
Global Research E-Book, Centre for Research on Globalization (CRG)
While SARS-CoV-2 –namely the the virus which is said to cause COVID-19 (categorized as a disease), was isolated in a laboratory test in January 2020, the RT-PCR test does not identify/ detect the virus. What it detects are fragments of viri. According to renowned Swiss immunologist Dr B. Stadler
So if we do a PCR corona test on an immune person, it is not a virus that is detected, but a small shattered part of the viral genome. The test comes back positive for as long as there are tiny shattered parts of the virus left. Even if the infectious viri are long dead, a corona test can come back positive, because the PCR method multiplies even a tiny fraction of the viral genetic material enough [to be detected].
The Question is Positive for What?? The PCR test does not detect the identity of the virus, According to Dr. Pascal Sacré,
these tests detect viral particles, genetic sequences, not the whole virus.
In an attempt to quantify the viral load, these sequences are then amplified several times through numerous complex steps that are subject to errors, sterility errors and contamination.
Positive RT-PCR is not synonymous with COVID-19 disease! PCR specialists make it clear that a test must always be compared with the clinical record of the patient being tested, with the patient’s state of health to confirm its value [reliability]
The media frighten everyone with new positive PCR tests, without any nuance or context, wrongly assimilating this information with a second wave of COVID-19.
Here we see that the test is so questionable that even a very small broken part of the virus comes back as positive when it probably should be negative. But this also shows that the COVID tests are “FALSE POSITIVES”. The world was shut down for a virus that was nothing more then the flu. Now, let us show you where Bill Gates comes into the fray.
The Controversial Drosten RT-PCR Study
- William Engdahlin a recent article documents how the RT-PCR Test was instated by the WHO at the outset, despite its obvious shortcomings in identifying the 2019-nCoV. The scandal takes its roots in Germany involving “a professor at the heart of Angela Merkel’s corona advisory group”:
On January 23, 2020, in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance, of the EU Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Dr. Christian Drosten, along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at Charité Hospital, [together] with the head of a small Berlin biotech company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, published a study entitled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance January 23, 2020).
While Drosten et al’s Eurosurveillance article (undertaken in liaison with the WHO) confirmed that “several viral genome sequences had been released”, in the case of 2019-nCoV, however, “virus isolates or samples from infected patients were not available … “:
“The genome sequences suggest presence of a virus closely related to the members of a viral species termed severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-related CoV, a species defined by the agent of the 2002/03 outbreak of SARS in humans [3,4].
We report on the the establishment and validation of a diagnostic workflow for 2019-nCoV screening and specific confirmation [using the RT-PCR test], designed in absence of available virus isolates or original patient specimens. Design and validation were enabled by the close genetic relatedness to the 2003 SARS-CoV, and aided by the use of synthetic nucleic acid technology.” (Eurosurveillance, January 23, 2020, emphasis added).
What this (erroneous) statement suggests is that the identity of 2019-nCoV was not required and that “validation” would be enabled by “the close genetic relatedness to the 2003-SARS-CoV.”
The recommendations of the Drosten study (supported and financed by the Gates Foundation) pertaining to the use of the RT-PCR test applied to 2019-nCoV were then transmitted to the WHO. They were subsequently endorsed by the Director General of the WHO, Tedros Adhanom. The identity of the virus was not required.
The Drosten et al article pertaining to the use of the RT-PCR test Worldwide (under WHO guidance) was challenged in a November 27, 2020 study by a group of 23 international virologists, microbiologists et al. “Their careful analysis of the original [Drosten] piece is damning. …They accuse Drosten and cohorts of “fatal” scientific incompetence and flaws in promoting their test” (Engdahl, December, 2020).
Notice above that the recommendations were supported and financed by the Bill Gates Foundation! Now, does this all bring some light to the “Communist Chinese Wuhan virus”? While it brings more questions than answers, it should open your eyes to the fact that this may well have been a very diabolical plan to hurt the world and make people adhere to the rules of the governments. Has it come to this? Have we as a people, from all over the world, allowed some people to direct us into a bin for them to watch over and make decisions for us? It seems that certain items were used to push the people into a certain keyhole directed by big governments to rule over us. With all of this now exposed, we have to stand tall and say no to continued tyranny until they can prove that this virus is more then the normal flu where people with prior conditions died not from COVID 19, but from other complications; and the world governments led us all on to think that we were in a pandemic when not a single pure part of COVID-19 can be presented for study.
We have to bring to question all of our governments and to those who drew up the tests that now show could not define a COVID-19 virus. Go to the following sites below to read the entire articles that tend to expose a fraud played upon the world.
- Christian Drosten & the Fraud Behind COVID 19 PCR Testing | Principia Scientific Intl. (principia-scientific.com)
- Counter Information: I’m a Clinical Lab Scientist, COVID-19 Is Fake, Wake Up America! (counterinformationblog.blogspot.com)
- What is Covid-19, SARS-2. How is it Tested? How is It Measured? The Fear Campaign Has No Scientific Basis
- Laboratories in US can’t find Covid-19 in one of 1,500 positive tests (greatreject.org)
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media