Despite Medical Journal’s Claims That Masks Offer “Little, If Any” Protection, Fauci Claims Wearing 2 Is “Common Sense”
Despite the fact that the New England Journal of Medicine has stated clearly that masks provide “little, if any” actual protection against viruses, Dr. Anthony Fauci claims that wearing two of them is common sense. This comes as China Joe Biden issues an unlawful mask mandate that he immediately refuses to abide by and then his press secretary, a retread from the Obama regime, justifies it in the most ridiculous manner.
-
Biden Wants Americans To Wear Masks For 100 Days After His Inauguration Despite Medical Journal’s Claims They “Offer Little, If Any, Protection From Infection”
-
New Medical Study: Face Masks Aren’t Protecting You
Remember, this is the guy that also wrote in the same medical journal that coronavirus was less severe than the flu, something that most of us already knew.
“If you have a physical covering with one layer, you put another layer on, it just makes common sense that it likely would be more effective,” Fauci said on NBC News‘ TODAY. “That’s the reason why you see people either double masking or doing a version of an N-95.”
- Buy All-American!
- Bring health and vitality back to your body with these non-transdermal patches
- Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
- How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation - Use promo code TIM to save $$$
- The Very Best All-American Made Supplements On The Maret
- Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Save with Promo Code TIM
- Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
- Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
- Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
- The Very Best Chlorine Dioxide
- All-American, US Prime, High Choice Grass-Fed Beef with NO mRNA, hormones or antibiotics... ever!
Oh, and look, the mainstream sleazia is right on cue in pushing Fauci’s stupidity that you should shame yourself with a mask and cut down your intake of oxygen.
What's the best way to wear your mask? 😷
Scientific studies have found a double layer of fabric and surgical masks are the most effective in filtering out particles.
📷AFP pic.twitter.com/nn0cFW6hhU— Philstar.com (@PhilstarNews) January 20, 2021
How gullible are people?
The New England Journal of Medicine writes:
We know that wearing a mask outside health care facilities offers little, if any, protection from infection. Public health authorities define a significant exposure to Covid-19 as face-to-face contact within 6 feet with a patient with symptomatic Covid-19 that is sustained for at least a few minutes (and some say more than 10 minutes or even 30 minutes). The chance of catching Covid-19 from a passing interaction in a public space is therefore minimal. In many cases, the desire for widespread masking is a reflexive reaction to anxiety over the pandemic.
And keep in mind that the majority of the alleged COVID-19 cases were from… admitted mask wearers.
-
Surprise! CDC Study Finds Most Con-Vid-19 Cases Were Admitted Mask Wearers
-
California: Woman Educates People, Including Nurse, At CVS Store On Why She Won’t Wear A Mask: “They’re Lying To Us… I’m Done!” (Video)
The good news is that the law protects you from wearing the shame muzzle if you don’t want to wear it.
If you are an employee, here is the law, according to Title VII of H.R. 7152, aka the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
“Sec. 703. (a) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for an employer—
(1) To fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate
against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or
privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin; or
(2) To limit, segregate, or classify his employees in any way which would deprive or tend
to deprive any individual of employment opportunities or otherwise adversely affect
his status as an employee, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or
national origin.
(d) It shall be an unlawful employment practice for any employer, labor organization,
or joint labor-management committee controlling apprenticeship or other training or
retraining, including on-the-job training programs to discriminate against any
individual because of his race, color, religion, sex, or national origin in admission to, or
employment in, any program established to provide apprenticeship or other training.”
If you are a customer, here is the law, according to Title II of H.R. 7152, aka the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
“Sec. 202. All persons shall be entitled to be free, at any establishment or place, from
discrimination or segregation of any kind on the ground of race, color, religion, or
national origin, if such discrimination or segregation is or purports to be required by any
law, statute, ordinance, regulation, rule, or order of a State or any agency or political
subdivision thereof.
Sec. 203. No person shall (a) withhold, deny or attempt to withhold or deny, or deprive or
attempt to deprive, any person of any right or privilege secured by section 201 or 202, or
(b) intimidate, threaten, or coerce, or attempt to intimidate, threaten, or coerce any
person with the purpose of interfering with any right or privilege secured by section 201
or 202, or (c) punish or attempt to punish any person for exercising or attempting to
exercise any right or privilege secured by section 201 or 202.”
Fauci doesn’t even wear them, except when he’s going to be on camera and then it’s hit or miss.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media