Home»US»Editorial In New England Journal Of Medicine Calls For Mandatory Vaccine Under Medical Tyranny

Editorial In New England Journal Of Medicine Calls For Mandatory Vaccine Under Medical Tyranny

Pinterest WhatsApp

The medical profession, specifically physicians, and public health officials have absolutely lost their morals, ethics, scientific critical thinking skills, compassion, and common sense. In other words, they have lost their entire minds, robotically parroting the programmed propaganda surrounding the “vaccine” for CON-VID-19. On October 1, 2020, the New England Journal of Medicine published an opinion piece authored by various individuals holding either an M.P.H. or Ph.D or both, calling for mandatory CON-VID-19 vaccinations for the population of the US. Their argument for “mandatory” vaccines tramples multiple rights of individuals, including the right to self-determine one’s health care and medical treatment or none at all, the right to be secure in one’s person, the right to work and freedom of movement. Moreover, their suggestions for penalties are aimed at avoiding any legal challenges “on procedural due process grounds.”

Their premise for “mandating” vaccines begins with citing the need for “herd immunity” through vaccination.

As Covid-19 continues to exact a heavy toll, development of a vaccine appears the most promising means of restoring normalcy to civil life. Perhaps no scientific breakthrough is more eagerly anticipated. But bringing a vaccine to market is only half the challenge; also critical is ensuring a high enough vaccination rate to achieve herd immunity. Concerningly, a recent poll found that only 49% of Americans planned to get vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2.1

One option for increasing vaccine uptake is to require it. Mandatory vaccination has proven effective in ensuring high childhood immunization rates in many high-income countries. However, except for influenza vaccination of health care workers, mandates have not been widely used for adults.

The authors – Mello, Silverman, and Omer, acknowledge a vaccine may be some time in the making; however, they urge developing a policy strategy framework to ensure uptake of the vaccine, which is where “mandates” come into play. These individuals’ recommendations are guided by “lessons from U.S. experiences with vaccines for the 1976 “swine flu,” H1N1 influenza, smallpox, and human papillomavirus (HPV).” If you know anything about the human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil, it was rushed into production, sidestepping many safeguards, and resulted in substantial injury to recipients. Gardasil is the measuring stick for the rushed CON-VID-19 vaccine.

Their mandatory vaccine campaign article continues:

We believe that six substantive criteria should be met before a state imposes a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine mandate (see box). The first is the existence of evidence that Covid-19 is inadequately controlled in the state by other measures, such as testing, contact tracing, and isolation and quarantine — as indicated by sustained, troubling trends in new cases, hospitalizations, or deaths. Principles of public health law and ethics require that interventions that impinge on autonomy be reasonable and necessary; therefore, Covid-19 must present an ongoing threat. By the time a vaccine is available, more will be known about natural immunity in the population, the consequences of relaxing community mitigation measures, and the feasibility of scaling up test-and-trace strategies. There should be a reasonable indication as to whether further measures are needed.

The six criteria are:

  • Covid-19 is not adequately contained in the state.

  • The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices has recommended vaccination for the groups for which a mandate is being considered.

  • The supply of vaccine is sufficient to cover the population groups for which a mandate is being considered.

  • Available evidence about the safety and efficacy of the vaccine has been transparently communicated.

  • The state has created infrastructure to provide access to vaccination without financial or logistic barriers, compensation to workers who have adverse effects from a required vaccine, and real-time surveillance of vaccine side effects.

  • In a time-limited evaluation, voluntary uptake of the vaccine among high-priority groups has fallen short of the level required to prevent epidemic spread.

In the second criteria, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) has to recommend vaccination for persons “who would be covered by a mandate”, AFTER the committee reviewed the safety and efficacy reports. Where are these safety and efficacy reports originating – the pharmaceutical company, the Food and Drug Administration, etc.? Big Pharma pays for FDA staff to approve new drugs through their payments to the FDA for approval applications. Those who the ACIP recommends a mandate would be groups like health care workers, nursing home patients, high-risk elderly, prison inmates, the military, and dormitory residents.

Mandates, these individuals assert, has to hinge on an adequate supply of the vaccination, meaning someone has to decide who gets the vaccine first. Another criterion is evidence of the vaccine’s safety and efficacy, which should be “transparently communicated”, according to these experts. Again, Gardasil is the benchmark here. Despite the “communicated safety and efficacy”, which was said at the time to be transparent, Gardasil has caused terrible long-lasting effects in many individuals. Now, Congress has made Big Pharma immune from litigation resulting from injury from this CON-VID-19 vaccine.

The solution these individuals contend is to have the “state”, read government that gets its money from taxpayers, establish avenues to compensate those who are injured as a result of the vaccine, in addition to providing “free” vaccines, while “monitoring” for vaccine side effects. In other words, those promoting “mandatory” vaccines and vaccines for free are advocating the taxpayer cough up compensation for those injured by these vaccines, instead of the pharmaceutical companies and those pushing for a vaccine, aka Bill Gates, Anthony Fauci, Robert Redfield, Deborah Birx, and a host of others.

They go on to malign the observational evidence of Hydroxychloroquine against this type of influenza that cannot be contributed to any “new” microorganism because the microorganism has not been isolated. These individuals who are to base recommendations on science ignore the established, gold standard science in favor of short cut methods ignoring Koch’s and Rivers’ postulates, “viral loads” (which has not been discussed because no proof of a microorganism has been established) and fast-tracked vaccines that ignore proper procedures, while denying the fact that no vaccine has been proven to be safe and/or effective. These individuals support a mandatory vaccine after “time-limited trial of voluntary vaccine provision has proved unsuccessful.” And, who determines the amount of time that would be and what would be considered “unsuccessful” – those who are basing their recommendations on inadequate science and scientific malpractice?

If this was not enough, these individuals suggest that States should exact penalties against those who refuse to be vaccinated with this poisonous soup no one knows what is in it much less what illness the vaccination is designed to prevent. Instead of fines or criminal penalties, these individuals suggest denying individuals who refuse the vaccination the ability to work and/or placing vaccine refusers under house arrest. Their rejection of fines and criminal penalties are two-fold – disadvantaging the poor through fines and invitation of legal challenges on procedural due process with criminal penalties.

Getting the picture? These individuals advocate for stripping individuals of their God-given individual unalienable rights through medical tyranny involving forced house arrest for non-compliant individuals with a mandate no government or government entity has the authority to issue. They are cleverly trying to provide a “work around” to the right to due process through medical dictates despite the fact that everyone has the right to choose or deny any medical treatment whatsoever.

And in their last sentiments, these unethical tyranny supporting individuals have crafted a plan to produce “public trust”.

The need to build public trust requires that state officials implement vaccination policy through a transparent and inclusive process, working closely with stakeholder groups such as local health officers, health professional and hospital associations, representatives of high-risk population groups, and groups concerned about vaccine safety. States’ experience with HPV vaccination mandates offers another process tip: vaccine manufacturers should stay on the sidelines. The HPV vaccine manufacturer’s direct involvement in crafting and lobbying for mandate legislation raised suspicion that profit rather than public health motives lay behind such proposals, undercutting support for vaccination even without a mandatory regime.5

As with social distancing orders, we can expect that the advent of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines will spark intense clashes of feeling about what people owe to one another in the fight against the pandemic. In contrast to earlier phases of the pandemic, though, we currently have some time on our side. Careful deliberation now about state vaccination policy can help ensure that we have a strategy when the breakthrough comes.

This is not a conspiracy theory; it is straight from a commentary appearing in the New England Journal of Medicine authored by unethical medical science tyrants. Take note of who these tyrants are looking toward to gain “public trust” – local health officials, health professionals and hospital associations, representatives of high-risk population groups, and groups concerned about vaccine safety. In other words, secure the support of these types of “groups” and get those groups to send the propaganda to “their people” who will then push it upon their patients and communities. While doing this, push pharmaceutical companies manufacturing this garbage to the sidelines to avoid raising suspicion of gaining profit over “public health motives”.

Fortunately, Bill Gates has already stepped forward to declare he will profit from this to the tune of $200 BILLION dollars from a $10 BILLION dollar investment. That should be enough to raise suspicion considering Gates contended that with a proper vaccine initiative the world’s population could be reduced by 10 to 15 percent. Moreover, “Daddy” Gates, who recently died, headed Planned Parenthood, the unborn baby murder mill, for years and was a well-known eugenicist.

The CDC has come clean on CON-VID-19 as reported by Ron Paul, with the audio being broadcast by Bradlee Dean on The Sons of Liberty radio show. The overall survival rate from CON-VID-19 is 99.94%. The supposed microorganism causing this “Con” coronavirus has never been isolated and likely never will. The vaccines being developed uses mRNA technology that has the potential to rewrite human DNA and may contain tracking biochips, nanobots, and other technology that will “control” your future actions, send and receive information, possibly alter brain patterns and a host of other “intended” consequences that no one will be informed about until afterward.

Article after article is available on The Sons of Liberty Media containing accurate information on CON-VID-19, as well as a host of videos on various platforms by reputable doctors such as Dr. Carrie Modej, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and dozens of others who are risking everything to inform the public of the truth. As they say, “you can lead a horse to water, but you can’t make it drink”. It’s been outlined for you. It’s been detailed for you. It is up to you to avail yourself of the information to be fully informed.

The plan is being put in place to “coerce” your compliance. In other words, a conspiracy is at foot against the American people to ensure the demise of your liberty and freedom. It is not a theory, but a fact. If they can’t “coerce” your compliance, it will be forced through various measures – medical tyranny, as indicated here, food shortages, “house arrests”, denial of work, denial of services, street rioting and violence, neighbor exposing neighbor, friend against friend, family against family, and other governmental tyranny. Take is as you will or don’t. These people are desperate to initiate the global government, a “new world order”, and will stop at nothing to do it. And, desperate times call for desperate measures.

When the people begin to feel the pain of various measures that will be unleashed against them, the desperate fearful public will engage in any action that will appear to ease their suffering only to find their suffering increases, which will perpetuate a cycle culminating in total submission and a breaking of will. The tyranny clock is now set at one minute to midnight. The alarm went off some time back. Wake up now and prepare to resist or be resigned to live as a people without freedom or liberty. As the song goes, “you don’t know what you have until it’s gone; they paved paradise and put up a parking lot.”

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Suzanne Hamner

Suzanne Hamner (pen name) is a registered nurse, grandmother of 4, and a political independent residing in the state of Georgia, who is trying to mobilize the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government, invasion by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education.
Previous post

Former Pfizer Executive Refutes Fauci & Lying Media On COVID Propaganda: "It's Over," "Curve Flattened Months Ago," "No Second Wave"

Next post

Corrupt Crackpot De Blasio Locking Down NYC AGAIN