Home»US»Fauci Admits To Zuckerberg COVID-19 Injections May Make Plandemic Worse (Video)

Fauci Admits To Zuckerberg COVID-19 Injections May Make Plandemic Worse (Video)

1
Shares
Pinterest WhatsApp

What if someone told you that the COVID injection, the injection that supposedly is “safe and effective”, could actually make one worse? Would you believe it? What if that person who said it was Dr. Anthony “I am Science” Fauci? And, what if you discovered that Fauci knew about some “injections” called vaccines causing individuals to get sicker or worsen with the illness the person was innoculated against?

As it turns out, Fauci admitted as much to Facebook entrepreneur and CEO Mark Zuckerberg in a short video and report on Trending Politics.

Dr. Anthony Fauci sat down with “Meta” CEO Mark Zuckerberg and finally said out loud what many people have been warning for over a year about the rushed mRNA vaccines: They may actually make the Covid pandemic worse.

Dr. Fauci was commenting on a recent study that showed that the Covid vaccines may actually make a recipient more likely to be reinfected than someone with natural immunity from a prior infection.

“This would not be the first time, if it happened, that a vaccine that looked good in initial safety actually made people worse,” Fauci said. “There was the history of the Respiratory Syncitial Virus vaccine in children, which paradoxically made the children worse.”

Read that again and let it sink in. Take your time and really digest what he is saying. So, for all of his “safe and effective” posturing; for all the push to get 100% of the population of the globe injected to “stop the pandemic”; for all the “a vaccine is the only way to return to ‘normal'” stances, Fauci is now admitting there is a history of some vaccines that actually caused a worsened illness among those who received it.

To clarify, this injection for the unisolated, unpurified, and unproven to exist COVID-19 illness is NOT a vaccine according to the definition contained in Taber’s Medical Cyclopedic Dictionary. This injection does meet the definition for a medical device and what is defined as gene therapy. The pharmaceutical companies even admit this is gene therapy, not a vaccine. This injection for CONvid-19 is best described as “an experimental mRNA human DNA altering gene therapy bioweapon injection”.

Moreover, this injection was classified as a vaccine by individuals at the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to make the injection “more acceptable” for the public so the public would roll up their sleeves and submit to a product that was rushed through development, had very little clinical trial information (if any at all), bypassed animal studies (which are unethical and do not translate over to humans at all), and enrich Big Pharma, Fauci, the CDC, and those at the NIH/NIAID. These same players sold it to the public as safe for children. And, it was done through fear mongering at the direction of these government shills using the Operation Mockingbird media.

As it turns out, the RSV vaccine was not the only vaccine that worsened an illness.

Dr. Fauci wasn’t done yet, though. He went on to state another example that he was directly involved with where a treatment made individuals worse.

One of the HIV vaccines that we tested several years ago actually made individuals more likely to get infected,” Fauci added.

Despite knowing this about certain past vaccines, Fauci and his government conspirators blatantly pushed a false narrative upon the people of the united States and the world.

It was in 2008 that researchers discovered the RSV vaccine failure, finally untangling the mystery that had pervaded for decades.

In the late 1960s, children in Washington, DC received an RSV vaccine in which the virus was inactivated with formalin,” Reuters reported. “Eighty percent of the children given the shot were hospitalized with severe respiratory disease, and two died. Many scientists had thought the formalin was responsible for the vaccine’s problems, but the chemical has been used safely in other vaccines.”

The problem, they report this month in the journal Nature Medicine, was that the children’s antibodies were not binding strongly enough to the inactivated virus to produce a protective immune response,” the report noted. “Instead, the antibodies were dragging the dead virus with them, triggering a massive attack by other arms of the immune system.”

In 2019, the National Institute of Health (NIH) admitted a safe and effective vaccine for RSV was still lacking. But, a safe and effective “vaccine” was developed for COVID-19 in a matter of months. Hardly. The FDA has requested a federal judge grant the unconstitutional agency 76 years to release the over 400,000 pages of documents submitted by Pfizer-BioNTech used in the “approval” process. Why take so long to release information that should be in the public domain if things are on the “up and up”?

The phenomenon being described is what is known as “leaky vaccines”, which according to a study out of Penn State University can cause viruses to become lethal for “unvaccinated” individuals.

Not all vaccines prevent infection,” PSU noted. “Some, known as leaky vaccines, prolong host survival or reduce disease symptoms without preventing viral replication and transmission. Although leaky vaccines provide anti-disease benefits to vaccinated individuals, new research by CIDD’s Andrew Read, David Kennedy and colleagues at the Avian Oncogenic Virus Group in the United Kingdom, and The University of New England in Australia, has demonstrated that leaky vaccines can make the situation for unvaccinated individuals worse.”

Leaky vaccines work by enhancing host immunity to a particular pathogen, without necessarily blocking or slowing viral replication,” the article continues. “The result is that infected but vaccinated individuals have extended survival, allowing highly virulent pathogen that would normally reach an evolutionary dead-end in a dead host, can transmit. The evolutionary consequences of high virulence are thus reduced and these pathogens can be selectively favored as a result of leaky vaccination. ”

So much for the “pandemic of the unvaccinated”. If what we are experiencing with these CONvid-19 injectable bioweapons are “leaky ‘vaccines'”, the individuals who remain uninjected are at considerable risk from those who have been injected. But, as yet, it is unclear if that is indeed the scenario being played out with the CONvid-19 injections. It is theory and hypothesis at this point.

This “leaky vaccine” scenario did occur when attempting to prevent Marek’s disease in chickens as reported by HealthLine in 2019. Marek’s disease is a form of herpes found in chicken dander and is more virulent that Ebola, according to Andrew Read, author of the study.

After experiments done in a specialized pathogen-containment facility at The Pirbright Institute in the United Kingdom, the researchers concluded that the vaccines developed to combat Marek’s disease were imperfect or leaky.

These vaccines also allow the virulent virus to continue evolving precisely because they allow the vaccinated individuals, and therefore themselves, to survive,” said Venugopal Nair, who led the research team. He is the head of the Avian Viral Diseases program at The Pirbright Institute.

These less-than-perfect vaccines create a “leaky” barrier against the virus. Vaccinated individuals may get sick but have less severe symptoms, but the virus survives long enough to transmit to others, which allows it to survive and spread throughout a population.

Our research demonstrates that the use of leaky vaccines can promote the evolution of nastier ‘hot’ viral strains that put unvaccinated individuals at greater risk,” Nair said.

Not coincidentally, a recent new Harvard study indicated these mRNA injections endorsed by the CDC and FDA are actually “worse than useless at stopping the spread of COVID-19” – the unisolated, unpurified, unproven to exist virus. This bears the question – what is the point of taking the injection?

According to Trending Politics:

The study of 68 nations and 2,947 counties in the United States published in the European Journal of Epidemiology showed that “At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days. In fact, the trend line suggest a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people.”

Kyle Becker of Becker News pointed out this very scenario back in September.

And, a new independent study at Medrxiv.org corroborates an Israeli study confirming that natural immunity is far superior to vaccine immunity.

But, let’s put this in context of what is known about the CONvid-1984, learned over the last two years. The “virus” that has been touted by government agencies to cause CONvid-1984 has never been isolated, purified or proven to exist using the gold standard of Koch’s postulates or Rivers’ postulates. The “viral genome” was constructed using a computer, not using a microparticle. The entire intact particle was never visualized using electron microscopy. In fact, the Chinese CDC and the US CDC admitted to never isolating the viral particle.

The World Health Organization (WHO), Fauci, Birx, the CDC and other government shills claimed this was a respiratory virus while claiming masks, social distancing, and “lockdowns” would “flatten the curve”. Yet, masks (facial coverings/breathing barriers) have openings too large to stop any viral particles contained in aerosolized respiratory ejections. Numerous studies have confirmed this to be true. Moreover, the measures of social distancing, lockdowns and mask usage came from a science project by a high school student whose father got the project published at PubMed – the NIH scientific study database.

When speaking of aerosolized respiratory ejections, anything aerosolized from an individual’s respiratory system into the air, indoors, can remain in circulation for up to 60 days. This means social distancing would be useless. As the Operation Mockingbird media, along with “mortality forecasters” spreading fear through the prediction of millions dying from this illness, used “masks” were seen littering parking lots, the roadsides, store floors, and empty shopping carts. It would make sense these masks would be considered biohazard because of the contamination with a deadly contagion. Yet, there was no provision for proper disposal of biohazard waste nor collection and incineration according to State medical statutes.

Medical science has always recommended the ill and most at-risk limit exposure to contagious illnesses and diseases with high mortality; but, never has the medical science community endorsed healthy individuals maintain a stance of what amounts to house arrest. The New England Journal of Medicine published an article in March 2020, which listed Anthony S. Fauci as one of the authors, indicating this “virus” was no more problematic than the seasonal flu. The article has not been taken down, redacted, or edited.

To “confirm” the presence of a “viral contagion”, the use of a PCR test was authorized under emergency use. According to the test’s inventor, Kary Mullis, this test is not meant for diagnostic purposes and cannot diagnose the presence or absence of any pathogen. With the urging for testing, “cases” began to explode everywhere. But, without an isolated, purified particle, what was being found? Without any isolates, the CDC used human tissue, cold and flu particles to “calibrate” the PCR test and recommended a high number of “cycles” which produced false results. And, when someone died, hospital entities were incentivized to list “COVID-19” on the death certificate. Even if an individual died from a car accident, if post-death, the individual’s PCR test indicated positive for COVID-19, the individual’s death was listed as a COVID death. Why would death numbers need to be inflated if the world was in the midst of a true deadly pandemic?

Strangely, the medical community did not ever develop a “treatment protocol” for COVID-19, as would be expected in a pandemic. Instead, the CDC, NIH and Fauci called the shots with Remdesivir and mechanical ventilation, which proved to be the wrong treatment and deadly. All the while, the people were not told about simple nutritional supplements and measures that could alleviate whatever illness people were contracting. Why wouldn’t information be given to people in order that they could help themselves instead of relying on a deadly medication like Remdesivir and unnecessary mechanical ventilation? At the same time, early treatment was discouraged and even denied by the medical community, which is in direct opposition to what doctors tell patients – catch things early for the best outcomes. Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin were found to be effective in individuals who were sick with this supposed virus. And, these two medications were quickly ridiculed, maligned, and denied to individuals who were sick. Doctors who discovered this and used these medications effectively were harassed, slandered, and ceremoniously sanctioned. Those promoting Vitamin D, Zinc, Chlorine Dioxide, and other measures received the same. Why?

The people were told by numerous entities “this will end with the development of a vaccine and 70% of the population gets injected”. Why did everything hinge upon a “vaccine” when simple measures and early treatment could have helped? Did anyone notice there was no cold and flu seasons for the past two years? Nothing has ended with the rollout of the injection. In fact, it’s almost a doubling and tripling down as the goal posts are moved by the puppets. Remember this as these psychopaths keep calling for younger and younger children to be injected – children who are not affected by whatever this is.

Keep all of this in mind when hearing or reading anything regarding the CONvid-1984, the injections, “leaky vaccines”, the PCR tests, a biolab leak, and any “new” treatments coming from the pharmaceutical companies. What we are witnessing is a failure on a massive scale of these injections – useless they are – as a true vaccine. These injections are a success if the goal is injury and/or death. Based on the information gathered and conveyed over the last year of administration of these injections and the admission by Fauci these shots could make the pandemic worse, would you say this is all going according to plan?

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media


Suzanne Hamner

Suzanne Hamner (pen name) is a registered nurse, grandmother of 4, and a political independent residing in the state of Georgia, who is trying to mobilize the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government, invasion by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education.
Previous post

Former Bill & Melinda Gates Virologist Warns There Will Be A "Collapse Of Our Health System" Due To COVID Shots (Video)

Next post

Doctor Gives Best Explanation In 10 Minutes For Why COVID Is A Con & The Shots Are Meant To Kill (Video)