Earlier today I wrote about the judicial coup. It wasn’t surprising that Dems and leftist activists would turn to their pet federal judges to block assorted Trump administration policies. But what is startling is the level of micromanagement from the judicial coup.

We’re not dealing with federal judges blocking a Muslim travel ban or a border wall, but mandating that the FDA and HHS have to push transgenderism.

That’s the actual ruling of Judge John Bates who commanded the FDA, CDC and HHS to display materials promoting the fictional concepts of transgenderism.

The absurd lawsuit by a leftist medical group, which claimed that doctors needed transgender materials on the HHS site in order to be able to treat their patients, was topped by a more absurd ruling, claiming that, “everyday Americans, and most acutely, underprivileged Americans, seeking healthcare,” will be harmed because doctors will be unable to “provide these individuals the care they need (and deserve) within the scheduled and often limited time frame, there is a chance that some individuals will not receive treatment, including for severe, life-threatening conditions. The public thus has a strong interest in avoiding these serious injuries to the public health.”

The activist group and the judge argue that “DFA’s arbitrary and capricious argument is simple: the agencies’ removal decisions were “completely unreasoned” and thus were not the product of reasoned decisionmaking.” That being any decision they disagree with.

The legal reach here ought to sprain an entire judiciary.

Doctors claim that because they use government websites, they won’t be able to possibly treat their patients unless those websites push their favored transgender ideology, which somehow translates into a mandate that the websites push that ideology.

Stripped of the pretense, a federal judge is contending that he can control the content of federal websites.

We’ve reached the very limit of this judicial coup and petty tyranny in which when Dems are in office, everything has to push transvestites and when they’re out of office, their judges insist that it’s in the public interest to force every part of the government to push transvestites.

Judge Bates has invented a statutory right to having government websites push his ideology. If this kind of thing stands, there will be no limit. This is the kind of decision that if it is not defied, will essentially eliminate the executive branch and the constitutional checks and balances.

If the White House doesn’t even have the right to control its websites, what can it control?

Article posted with permission from Daniel Greenfield