I have decided to write this commentary in an unusual way.  Readers will notice there are no names indicated because of the word “censorship.”  Billionaires control social media by deciding what should be printed and what they deem goes against their political agenda.  One highly used internet service flashes financial contributions for a presidential contender when a user signs on.

Then the most popular social media site decides what can be seen by subscribers and what cannot.  They use the words “fact checkers” and freely suspend service to those who violate their “media malignancy.”  And we allow it.

Years gone (the Huntley and Brinkley era) do you remember media projections on important elections being used as a roller coaster to influence voters?  All social media and many newspapers project numbers almost hourly on who will be a likely winner in an election.  Think voters are being taken in by this control?

Question for you — have you ever been asked to participate in a poll inquiring where your vote will be cast?  Why is the media allowed to influence voters on what candidate is ahead all day — every day?  Shouldn’t the “malignant media” be charged with “voter interference?”

Then there’s a man I have the highest respect for in protecting our children from over-vaccinations at ages barely out of newborn status.  I had the privilege of being asked to be a contributor to his very informative website.  A website promoting themselves for professionals read a newspaper article I wrote about the FDA and this particular person and banned me from their site.  I was told I would have to send them a photocopy of my driver’s license for them to decide if they would open my account again.  Needless to say, they did not receive what they requested. Censorship?  Malignant censorship and they are allowed to do it.

This same individual as I have written about above has challenged the FDA and medical professionals in an effort to stem the rising numbers of autism diagnoses and other maladies affecting our children medically and emotionally.  What better way to silence someone who has worked for decades on the safety of vaccinations for our children than to put salacious headlines and stories about him in publications by the “malignant media.”

Where is the news coverage on the fentanyl tsunami killing our young people?  There has been silence as the “malignant media” focuses on “voter interference” not the deaths of a young generation.

Open borders allowing drug cartels, human traffickers, and criminals into our country should have had massive news coverage.  It did not.  Every family member losing a loved one to the open borders should have appeared in mass at the borders.  The “malignant media” may not have ignored that.

As the “malignant media” influences the uninformed voters, keep in mind who is a “heartbeat” away from being the leader of our country and the underachiever potentially leading our country into a fire pit of socialism.

Currently, we have approximately 2 million (and growing daily) illegal migrants who have crossed borders to enter our country.  The “malignant media” refers to these illegals as “immigrants.”

I had a grandfather and Nana who came to America at the turn of the century from Sicily.  They came to Ellis Island in NY with paperwork legally for a new life in America.  They settled in the Bronx, NY and my grandpa, who I never met, set up a shoe repair business on the street to support his growing family.  The fact that my grandpa was blind never prevented him from becoming a proud American who had once been an immigrant — not an illegal migrant.

Have you had enough of the “malignant media” infiltrating your life?  I sure have.