Home»Commentary»Koch’s Postulates, Rivers Postulates, Coronavirus & The Vaccine Development Process

Koch’s Postulates, Rivers Postulates, Coronavirus & The Vaccine Development Process

1
Shares
Pinterest WhatsApp
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

About a month ago, Dr. Carrie Madej created a video exposing the problems with the upcoming COVID-19 vaccine.  One very serious problem with this vaccine is two-fold – it has bypassed Koch’s postulates;  and, it uses recombinant DNA and recombinant RNA, which has never been used in humans.  There are other serious problems as well, such as the possibility of the vaccine rewriting human DNA, essentially “creating” a new organism that is modified at the genetic level, which can then be “patented” and “owned” by the company who developed the vaccine;  or, the insertion of nanobot technology into the body which can then be activated using an artificial intelligence interface to alter anything in your body and brain.

In this second video, Dr. Madej covers many of the same issues that have been reported here at Sons of Liberty Media.  In it, she specifically mentions again Koch’s postulates.  But, what are Koch’s postulates to the lay individual?

For an entire tutorial on Koch’s postulate, see the video by Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD.  In simple terms, the four Koch’s postulates are listed below.

  1.  The microorganism must be found in abundance in all organisms suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy organisms;
  2.  The microorganism must be isolated from a diseased organism and grown in a pure culture;
  3.  The cultured microorganism should cause disease when introduced into a health organism;
  4.  The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased experimental host and identified as being identical to the original specific causative agent.

So, when it has been said that the coronavirus microorganism that causes COVID-19 has not been identified, it is because the medical scientific community has not provided any study or research to show that Koch’s postulates have been met.  But, Koch’s postulates cannot be met for viral microorganisms since these types of microorganisms require a “host” in order to reproduce.  In this instance, Rivers postulates, from 1937, is used.  Even applying RiveRs postulates, the six criteria reported by Dr. Kaufman, the medical scientific community has not provided any study or research to indicate Rivers postulates have been fulfilled for SARS-CoV2 or coronavirus/COVID-19.  Rivers postulates was reported as fulfilled for the SARS-CoV1 (studies exist indicating it was not), but the COVID-19 is supposedly a different microorganism.

However, there is a problem with Rivers postulates – genetic material (DNA, RNA) is not mentioned in any criteria.  Yet, many of the studies claim to have isolated genetic material.  Moreover, even if all of Rivers postulates are met, it only produces a “fairly confident” assertion the disease is caused by the viral microorganism – it is still uncertain but one can “assume” a fair confidence of a viral microorganism causing the disease.  Dr. Kaufman goes through the scientifically accepted method for isolating viruses.  The key is that this method has not been used for COVID-19.  Even if it were, scientists cannot conclusively say the supposed microorganism causing the disease is a virus.

In describing the method used with COVID-19, there are some serious pitfalls with the method, including claiming to isolate genetic material, which is not mentioned in Rivers postulates and using antibiotics that cause mammalian cells to produce exosomes.  Dr. Kaufman covered four papers that attempted to satisfy Rivers with SARS-CoV1.  In all the papers covering the studies by four different scientists, none of Rivers was actually satisfied.

Watch the entire presentation and you get the idea.  Using the same Rivers postulates with COVID-19, the four papers that detailed the research studies to “isolate” COVID-19 did not meet any criteria of Rivers.  The “Kim” paper boldly stated the coronavirus was the “causative agent” of the COVID-19 disease outbreak in Wuhan, China.  However, the source the “Kim” paper quoted used “association” and “potential association” while calling for additional studies.  This is a very huge issue.  In essence, the “Kim” paper can be considered fraudulent and the basis for the entire fiasco the world has endured.  Moreover, the McMasters University, Canada study expounded on the lie of the “Kim” paper to claim the coronavirus cause the pandemic in over 160 world countries.  

This is disturbing, to say the least!  Medical science and ethics have been compromised to the point that any study presented to the public should be viewed with great skepticism.

Could these be the papers that Fauci is relying upon and Trump is backing to push forward a Gates vaccine with nefarious purpose?

If you cannot isolate the causative agent, how do you know what causes a disease much less are able to develop a vaccine for it?  This is a question that no one has answered but one that needs to be answered for the public in the name of disclosure and to provide informed consent.

Before continuing, a disclaimer is needed.  This does not advocate for vaccines since vaccines have not been proven to be effective or safe.  The purpose is to show this vaccine is not based on accepted scientific methodology that resulted in the isolation of a microorganism and the steps in the development have taken shortcuts and safety measures are being sidestepped for Bill Gates and Big Pharma to produce a vaccine for COVID-19 that the US government is looking to make mandatory for all Americans.  It doesn’t matter whether any microorganism has been isolated or not.  It doesn’t matter whether it works or not.  It doesn’t even matter if it is unsafe.  The government wants to forcefully inject Americans with only God knows what.

Now, let’s look at the process for the development of a vaccine.  The Center for Disease Control (CDC) identifies 6 phases for development.  Knowing the proclivity for government agencies to lie to the public, this is taken at face value, but with skepticism.  Clinical development is further divided into three phases.  Once all of this is done, the product approval process begins.  From the CDC website, this is another 6-phase process.  Even after approval, adverse effects of the vaccine are tracked through the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

So, how long does this 12-phase process take?  That is variable.  According to the book, “The Children’s Vaccine Initiative:  Achieving the Vision”,  the Food and Drug Administration’s timeline for approving Product License Application and the Establishment License Application submitted by manufacturers can take as much as six months.  This is down from approximately three years due to passage of the Drug User Free Act in 1992, which mandated pharmaceutical companies submit $100,000 or more in fees for each application to expand the FDA staff that approves these vaccines.  Conflict of interest much with the FDA?  Standard applications will still take approximately one year.  Yet, the public is being told a vaccine for COVID-19 will be ready for widespread administration in the fall.

The takeaway here is that there is a long and rigorous process that vaccines are supposed to travel through before being “approved” for widespread usage.  Even when vaccines have gone through this process, it has been shown that vaccines have not been proven effective or safe.  With the COVID-19 “vaccine” being fast-tracked, skipping even the most crucial steps using Rivers postulates, how would anyone know what is being injected into your body?  The answer is you don’t know.  Nor do you know whether or not any of the 12-phase processes were followed or skipped.

All of these “processes” are designed to make sure that whatever is placed into the human body is safe and effective for the target population.  Unfortunately, these “processes” are done through public-private partnerships, government agencies unconstitutionally created to “keep the people safe”, and now, a private individual who holds no medical training whatsoever and is beholden to no one.  This same individual is a eugenicist and responsible for hundreds of thousands of injuries and deaths of children in foreign nations.  And, none of this has ever produced one safe and effective vaccine.

Considering the number of doctors who have come forward at great risk to themselves – Dr. Simone Gold was recently fired for her dissemination of factual information – to inform the public of effective treatment without a vaccine, why is the vaccine being pushed over a simple treatment that can be used also as a prophylactic?  It all comes down to the money to be made by the game players on the sacrifice of human health, well being and lives;  not to mention, it is the vector by which humans can be injected with tracking devices, nanobot technology, and other nefarious substances that the government can use to exact control over the population. 

It is easy for some to proclaim this as “tin foil hat wearing” theory without considering sources and references that prove the claims made.  So many are willing to take the “medical” advice of a man, Bill Gates, who has no medical training whatsoever and refuse to listen to actual medical doctors who have researched this extensively in good faith to inform the public of the lies visited upon them by government, Fauci, Gates, and Trump.  Moreover, so many are wearing masks despite the warnings of ineffectiveness against coronavirus and influenza and potential for serious health risks associated with prolonged mask-wearing.  All of this because Trump, Fauci, Birx, Redfield, Gates, and the lamestream government-controlled propaganda entertainment enemedia suggested it.  

Knowing this, it would be safe to say this would be the same population that would believe that Arizona has beachside property for sale at a reduced price due to coronavirus if these same people said so, while providing very little evidence to support their claim.  How many would contact a real estate agent to get their slice of “beach pie”?  Looking at the mask wearers and the “doubting Thomas’”, it would be a good many.  Another group will be hostile and negative toward the messenger.  Why be angry at those trying to disseminate information to a public that is being denied information?  The energy would be better spent dealing with those who have perpetrated the lie.  Ask yourself this – why haven’t journalists who report on the advances in medical science and the developmental steps of new drugs and vaccines never asked any questions regarding the process of isolation or development of this COVID-19 vaccine?

Time to trash the cognitive dissonance.  It’s difficult and could produce serious adverse emotional reactions.  It won’t last long and you will be the better prepared with knowledge that could free you from your enslaved mind state.  For those who can’t shake their willful ignorance, cognitive dissonance and anger toward the messenger, flame on!  Your comments support our efforts and are greatly appreciated.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

TRENDING:  Former Federal Reserve Official Bill Dudley’s Noble Lie

Suzanne Hamner

Suzanne Hamner (pen name) is a registered nurse, grandmother of 4, and a political independent residing in the state of Georgia, who is trying to mobilize the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government, invasion by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •   
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Don't forget to follow us on Facebook, Twitter, MeWe, Minds, Gab, and Spreely.

Previous post

Fibromyalgia: What Is It & Can It Be Treated?

Next post

America’s Frontline Doctors Website Shut Down