Leaked Memos Show George Soros Responsible For Social Media Censorship
In the following video, you’ll learn that George Soros has started another far-left political organization named Demos, and Demos is intended to work in coordination with other Soros far-left groups like moveon.org, Democracy Spring, and Black Lives Matter. The difference between Demos and the other groups, according to the article below from Breitbart, is that Demos is intended to operate in a much more “stealthy & politically correct mode” than its Soros counterparts.
Make no mistake however, as a Soros backed operation, Demos will be the beneficiary of all the typical overindulgence normally afforded to Soros run organizations, and the group is expected to closely follow Saul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals,” as you’ll find out below. In the video below, I break down how recent developments by Soros and Co., could spell the end of national sovereignty for the United States. The information that follows is devastating.
The left-wing think tank that released a controversial report about Islamophobia on Twitter was directly funded by George Soros’ Open Society Foundation.
Left-wing think tank Demos released a new report that conflates Islamophobia with any criticism of Islam Friday claiming that Islamophobic tweets had become so frequent that Twitter should actively engage in censorship to stop the comments. Leaked documents from the Open Society Foundation (OSF) show that George Soros’ organization funded Demos to be able to conduct research over social media platforms like Twitter.
According to the document, “List of European Elections 2014 Projects,” Demos received 129,484 dollars from Open Society Initiative for Europe (OSIFE), the European arm of the international foundation. The description of the money claims the funds are to be used to create software to scour data on Twitter. It reads:
“Demos will produce tools and techniques, like open source software, that could be used to analyze real time Twitter data, in order to allow campaigners to increase turnout of target groups. These tools will be made available online free of charge.”
Chief Executive Claudia Wood claims that the method developed by Demos could identify “hateful, derogatory, and anti-Islamic” tweets in real time, exactly the features described by the leaked Soros document. The leak also specifies that Demos received the grant from OSIFE in order that they share the software with other groups across Europe. “Demos will also train advocates and civil society groups interested in civic and political participation through a series of two-day face-to-face workshops in France, Greece, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, and the UK,”the document reads.
The Demos study was criticized by National Secular Society communications officer Benjamin Jones who remarked that the methodology of the study was unsound and claiming a link between violent passages in the Koran and racism,”creates a false moral equivalence between racism and criticizing a set of ideas.”
While there is no mention of Islamophobia in the Demos grant, there are several other grants listed that specifically tackle criticism of Islam. In the Netherlands OSIFE directly funded groups that claimed to be tackling Islamophobia including Spior and umbrella organization for Islamic groups in Rotterdam.
OSIFE gave the group 24,970 dollars over a period of five months in 2012 to “realize a preliminary research into the nature and principal features of islamophobia in the Netherlands, preceding the development and executing of a (periodical) monitor on islamophobia,” showing that the foundation was, at the time, keen on developing a means to monitor Islam-critical speech online. Spior received a further 100,000 dollars in 2013 to, “promote participation in the political process amongst underrepresented groups, particularly migrants, women and Muslims.”
Censorship of Muslim and migrant critical speech online has become a major issue in European countries like Germany and the UK. In Germany dozens of people have had their homes raided by police for anti-migrant comments and in the UK Muslim critical comments have led to arrests and fines. London’s first Muslim mayor Sadiq Khan has also vowed to create an “Online Hate Crime Hub” to monitor so-called hate crimes.
In essence, “Demos,” as with most beneficiaries of Soros’ largesses, operates underSaul Alinsky’s “Rules for Radicals” except in a more stealthy & politically correct mode.
At a minimum, Demos, at the direction of Soros, appears to be utilizing Alinksy’s*RULE 10: “If you push a negative hard enough, it will push through and become a positive” which points to Demos’ efforts at trying to camouflage the brutality of most Islamic-oriented cultures, by characterizing Muslims as cultural victims rather than cultural invaders seeking conquest & territory.
However, with the emergence of the Soros leaked emails & his funding intended to bankroll software designed to target both free speech, and those with opposing viewpoints, we can now observe that Demos, at the behest of Soros and his Open Society Foundation, is growing decidedly more aggressive by the day.
In fact, it appears that Demos has gone straight to rule 12, of the Alinsky playbook,in defense of Islam, which states the following;
RULE 12: “Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions.
Demos, in contrast to their more shadowy if not hidden face, touts itself as being all about democracy and promoting America’s melting pot as being that which makes America exceptional, effectively stealing a page from the conservative playbook and re-languaging American exceptionalism into an agenda approaching maximum deception.
While espousing flowery sounding goals, Demos, in effect, significantly revisions its entire reason for being under these auspicious milestones, from their website:
1. “Achieving true democracy by reducing the role of money in politics and guaranteeing the freedom to vote.”
True democracies always fail, says none other than America’s founding fathers.
A true democracy results in rule by a mob rather than the rule of law and eventually leads to anarchy ( see the group “Black Lives Matter” for a presaging example.)
In addition, the freedom to vote, in this case, is double-speak for the freedom of non-citizens to take part in US elections and enabling operatives to vote early and often, in the same election.
2. ”Creating pathways to ensure a diverse expanded middle class in a new, sustainable economy”
Obama’s mixed-market Socialism impetus in conjunction with crony-capitalism, in the US, has actually caused a maximum contraction of America’s middle class, the first time this has happened since the Carter presidency; with home ownership at lows not seen in over 51 years, and black poverty reaching historical highs.
Further, sustainability is left-wing parlance for the inception of both UN Agendas-21 and-30, which seeks to eradicate National sovereignty to the United Nations in favor of a globally controlled centralized government, which includes the diaphanous agenda of climate change.
3. ”Transforming the public narrative to elevate the values of community andracial equity.”
Transforming the public narrative is merely a gentler way of alluding to the elimination of US free speech and America’s individual 1st amendment rights, a thing that has already been augmented in Europe, where critics of Islam are actually charged and incarcerated.
Ideological opposites of the radical left celebrate America’s exceptionalism as a Constitutional function of cultural absorption and the celebration of the individual rather than the segmentation of cultures into a multi-cultural society. In effect, both Soros and Demos are empowering the complete globalization of America’s culture in order to balkanize and effectively destroy the very nature of what American culture is, as they are now also doing, throughout Europe, in deleting European culture.
Indeed, most political opinionists have failed to recognize the bizarre fact that both Europe and America are being invaded from their southern borders, simultaneously, as if it were all the result of mere happenstance, when in fact, all indicators point to the engineering of the refugee crisis in order to defeat the cultural precepts of the west, otherwise known as Christendom.
While all indicators of this agenda had previously been hardened theory prior to 2016, this story has now evolved into the realm of cold hard fact, pointing to a generalized planetary agenda that has become undeniable.
The west is at war with the global elites and their brownshirts, the Islamists, which is a pinnacle reason for Donald Trump’s ascendancy as America’s sole anti-Globalist leader.
In effect, it’s not that the New World Order is coming, but rather it’s arrived in America, and is putrifying in Europe, as buttressed by the stealthy infiltration of Globalism into leftist & Centrists parties all across the West and certainly in the Republican establishment of America.
This, in large part, is why we see so many inside that same incorrigibly corrupt political establishment pushing an open borders agenda, while also insisting upon a mass Islamic refugee incursion into the West, unabated.
The political elite, while remaining apart from the cultures within which they operate, have a grander goal in mind, and it has nothing to do with individual national sovereignty.
Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand