Home»World»New Zealand Health Officials Attempt To Take Custody Of Infant Due To Parents Requesting Direct Blood Donation

New Zealand Health Officials Attempt To Take Custody Of Infant Due To Parents Requesting Direct Blood Donation

Pinterest WhatsApp

Freedom of choice, freedom to make informed medical decisions, freedom to practice your religion, and other rights and liberties are being denied by the medical tyrants under the auspices of the coronavirus hoax. As you are aware, the demand for blood from unvaccinated donors is increasing. The reason is because the CONvid-1984 injections cause the blood to contain toxins and other materials, a spike protein, that can cause damage to those who have not been injected with the CONvid-1984 poisonous injections. This is a valid concern which medical tyrants continually deny without having any evidence to back their claims of “safety” where the blood supply is concerned.

Health officials in New Zealand are attempting to take custody of a 4-month-old infant who needs heart surgery because the parents are requesting blood from individuals who have not received the CONvid-1984 injection.

From Brian Shilhavy, editor at Health Impact News:

Health Authorities in New Zealand are trying to take custody of a 4-month-old baby that needs heart surgery, because the parents don’t want the baby to receive blood from someone who has been vaccinated against COVID-19.

According to an interview with the parents, the parents are not refusing medical treatment, and agree with the doctors who state that their baby needs immediate heart surgery.

They just want to donate their own blood from their own donors, and they claim they already have more than 20 pediatric donors who have been screened and could donate their blood for the needed surgery.

But doctors are refusing, because they claim the parents’ beliefs are unfounded and that vaccinated blood is perfectly safe. The corporate media in New Zealand is branding the parents as crazy anti-vaccination conspiracy theorists.

Why is it that doctors will accept the beliefs of Jehovah’s Witnesses who refuse blood transfusions based on their “faith” while individuals who base their decisions on sound facts, such as these parents, are vilified and their “beliefs” called unfounded? All these parents are asking for is a directed donation of blood, which is not a problem for any reason per the American Red Cross, and have already attained donors. It matters not what these doctors “believe”. There is no logical medical reason for these doctors to refuse these parents and the directed blood donation except being hateful, tyrannical, and seeking to remove a child from loving parents for some nefarious means.

Brian wrote:

I have read two articles in the corporate news, one from The Guardian, and one from NZHerald.com, and both sources make it sound like the parents are refusing “life-saving treatment” for their baby due to their “conspiracy” beliefs.

But a former TV news reporter, Liz Gunn, who is now with FreeNZ Media, attended a meeting the parents had with health authorities and also interviewed the parents afterwards, so that the public can hear directly from the parents themselves regarding what their desires are.

They state that they want what’s best for their 4-month-old baby, and that they agree with the doctors, but simply want unvaccinated blood.

According to Liz Gunn, doctors bullied the mother and tried to get her to see a psychologist.

This is something I warned the public about a few days ago, when I reported how medical authorities are now trying to label antivaxxers as mentally insane and dangerous, and that one of the results of doing so would be to take away their children if they refused vaccines. 

The surgeon scheduled to do the surgery on the baby allegedly said, “I will not call the blood bank” to make a request that they collect blood from unvaccinated donors.

When asked why, he allegedly responded: “Because I don’t believe in what you’re saying.”

To which Liz Gunn replied: “We don’t need your belief, we just need you to listen to the parents and what they want.”

This goes right along with the Mt. Hamner eruption rightly claiming that the medical tyrants are pushing “their” beliefs on patients and families. There is no medical justification for this doctor to refuse. There is a risk with any blood transfusion – these parents are just trying to minimize one. Medical tyrants are perfectly willing to deny you treatment based on their beliefs but are not willing to treat you based on yours. And, what the parents are requesting is NOT unusual. Long before CONvid-1984, many people participated in directed blood donation and autologous blood donation for various reasons. The American Red Cross does not care what your reasons are. The organization is more than willing to assist in providing directed blood donation and autologous blood donation services within guidelines.

The medical tyrants now claim utilizing directed blood donation, because you do not want blood from CONvid-1984 injected individuals, deserves “psychoanalysis”. Regardless of the reason for wanting directed blood donation, it is an option for everyone. Yet, this “surgeon” flatly refused to contact the organization to activate a directed blood donation initiative. Remember, the parents had already attained 20 pediatric donors! His refusal was based upon his belief.

Why does his belief overrule the parents who are acting in the best interest of their child? What “harm” or additional “risk” would come from using directed blood donation from known donors? But, harm or additional risk was not the surgeon’s concern nor did the surgeon provide any sound logical medical reasoning for refusal – only his belief.

As stated in the Mt. Hamner eruption, medical care and treatment are becoming a one-way street – bow to the medical tyrants or be left to die. In the case of this infant, the parents are to bow to the medical tyrants or risk losing custody of their child. And, for what? It is all based on the “belief” of the surgeon. Asking again, “what makes his beliefs or the beliefs of the medical tyrants more important than others’”? It is well-known in the medical community, but has now been pushed to the wayside, that providing patients and their families with “peace of mind” goes a long way in contributing to the healing process.

An administrative court hearing was held in Auckland on November 30, 2022, to establish a date for an urgent hearing.

Where is the requirement for the medical workers to prove to their patients and families “safety”? There isn’t – you are just supposed to take their word for it. In other words, you are to believe what they say without any evidence whatsoever. Asking for proof unleashes hostilities that are unfounded, as well as verbal abuse, name-calling, and outrageous actions – all on the part of the medical establishment just because you ask questions and desire proof.

Doctors and nurses may not “believe” that having a certain item provides protection from harm, but they don’t have to believe it. If the patient believes it, providing it helps ensure peace of mind conducive to promote healing. No harm, no foul. In the case of these parents using directed blood donation for their infant, there is plenty of evidence to indicated blood from CONvid-1984 donors can cause adverse effects. There is no harm or foul in using directed blood donation. And, the directed blood donation would provide a huge peace of mind to the parents their child would sense and be conducive to the healing process.

As they say, “something is rotten, and it ain’t the cheese”.

For patients and families who are facing this denial for directed blood donation from the medical tyrants, it creates an additional stress that is unnecessary. More and more individuals will be faced with this situation should a family member or themselves require surgery that could involve needing an infusion of blood, especially if your or your family members have not taken the CONvid-1984 poison injection. Remember, the blood banks nor the American Red Cross distinguish between injected and un-injected blood. The only way to know for sure is through directed blood donation or autologous blood donation. It’s time for the individuals who have not been injected with the CONvid-1984 poison injection to band together and assist one another when it comes to the potential for needing blood infusions. It’s time to push back against these medical tyrants who are refusing based only on their beliefs and not sound logical medical reasoning.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media

Suzanne Hamner

Suzanne Hamner (pen name) is a registered nurse, grandmother of 4, and a political independent residing in the state of Georgia, who is trying to mobilize the Christian community in her area to stand up and speak out against tyrannical government, invasion by totalitarian political systems masquerading as religion and get back to the basics of education.
Previous post

What Happens When People Fail To Heed John Adams' Warning (Video)

Next post

Kentucky Governor Pardoned Man Convicted Of Robbery & Assault - Man Just Got Convicted In First Of 3 Strangulations