Home»US»Texas Drafts Bill to Halt Importing of Invaders by Obama and UN

Texas Drafts Bill to Halt Importing of Invaders by Obama and UN

Pinterest WhatsApp

Obama has hung the “Welcome to America” sign for tens of thousands of refugees from the Middle East, and God only knows where else, at the “command” of the United Nations. “Swiftboat” parades around the media “declaring” the US will increase its importation of refugees yearly in response to the Syrian crisis — a crisis created by America, but I digress. Under the plan, the US government decided which States and cities would receive the “refugees,” who are not refugees at all, but terrorists in disguise entering to join with their jihadi buddies hanging out in the 35 or so terrorist camps dotted throughout the US. So, who exactly is “ruling” this nation — the UN, Obama the puppet of someone else in charge, the States or the people? Hint: it isn’t the States or the people.

Without so much as taking into consideration the costs these localities would incur by “dropping hundreds of Jihad Johnnies” in each city, Obama and “Swiftboat” careen on in their Islamization of America. However, one Congressional Representative is seeking to halt this government-sponsored invasion until the costs for each locality can be determined.

Texas Republican Rep. Brian Babin introduced a bill that seeks to halt “refugee” resettlement in the US until a “thorough assessment of the costs and dangers of the process is conducted.” Known as the “Resettlement Accountability and National Security Act,” the drafted bill by Babin is a product of the Obama administration’s expansion of the “refugee” program — one Babin believes is flawed.

Babin, a conservative, told the Daily Caller, “What we’re trying to do here is to put a temporary halt to the refugee program until the general accounting office can do an assessment of just exactly how much this is costing the taxpayer. It’s something that needs to be addressed and needs to be addressed quickly because what it amounts to is an open invitation. To import the problems of the Middle East, of terrorism, oppression of women and all the things that go with it, into the United States of America.”

It sounds good Rep. Babin. However, the problems you cite occurring in the Middle East of terrorism, oppression of women and everything else stems from Islam. THAT is what has to be recognized as that is what Obama is dumping inside our nation — Muslim individuals who may not all come from Syria. The real point is Obama imports the murderers and oppressors of Middle Eastern Christians in order for these savages to have “fresh targets.” The US should be supporting and offering asylum to Middle Eastern Christians. Where is the stance on that from anyone in Congress? There’s a lot less Christians in the Middle East to host than the terrorist army of hundreds of thousands Obama means to import.

Babin referred to several problems with importing Middle Eastern “refugees.”

First — economics. According to Babin, ninety (90) percent of “refugees” already receive some type of assistance. Between 2008 and 2013, 91% of accepted “refugees” were on food stamps, “73 percent on Medicaid refugee medical assistance,” and 68 percent on cash welfare programs. Babin claims this does not account for state and local community costs.

Second — National Security. With the dumping of tens of thousands of Middle Eastern Muslims into US communities, Babin is concerned the US will witness problems experienced by European nations — “no go zones” where Muslims do not assimilate but perpetuate their culture in areas they claim as Muslim; increase crime and terrorism; and, establishment of “Sharia zones” with patrols attacking male and female non-Muslims.

“It doesn’t take a genius to see what is happening in Western Europe and has happened over the last few years where they have no-go zones in Liverpool and Paris and London and Amsterdam and Copenhagen,” he explained. “These folks just don’t assimilate … You have unassimilated refugees that basically just create small microcosms of the countries from which they came. Whether it be Somalia or whether it be Iraq or Syria, this is what you wind up with.”

Third — denial of States’ rights. Babin contends that States and communities have virtually no input or say in the matter of the government dumping “refugees” into their populations despite the local governments footing bills for these “refugees.” Instead of States and local communities choosing whether or not to receive “refugees,” the UN recommends the refugees and private contractors select the locations for the UN-referred “refugees.”

“What I’m hearing, and what my office is hearing — from state representatives and mayors, county judges all across states like Idaho and Minnesota — it’s just incredible, and they have very little say of where and when these people, and if they’re gonna come in. They can’t stop it.”

“And now all of a sudden, schools, hospitals, law enforcement agencies, and all the local amenities are suddenly flooded with refugees and the federal benefits packages that these people, these entitlement programs, some of these will want out and then they’re loaded on to the local and state entitlement programs becomes a huge burden on the local taxpayers.”

Every American can applaud Rep. Babin’s efforts. After all, America has an invasion problem with anyone and everyone allowed into this nation illegally and invaders forced upon our communities through Obama’s submission to UN edict. Babin recognizes the issues communities face through the import of UN mandated individuals.

Babin, however, needs to drop the politically correct terminology. These people being thrust upon this nation by the UN and the Obama administration are NOT refugees; they are Muslim invaders intent on waging jihad and turning the US into another Euro”trash”zone. Moreover, Babin needs to recognize the problem is Islam, plain and simple. Last, but not least, Babin and his Congressional cohorts need to recognize that Congress makes the laws, not Obama and certainly not the UN, in this nation. As a sovereign nation that makes laws regarding immigration, the US is under no obligation to accept any “UN designated” individuals for relocation. That decision on who to admit and accept rests solely within our government, specifically Congress who the Constitution authorizes to make laws concerning immigration and naturalization.

Of course, the liberal, communist, socialist Democrats and RINOs in both chambers of Congress are intent on helping Obama with his plan to destroy this nation. Babin’s bill may make it out of the House, might make it past the Senate, but His Royal Muslim will surely veto it. There would be almost zero chance getting enough Senate votes to override the veto. As been touted before, Boehner disagrees with impeachment and Gowdy blasts, “Have you met Joe Biden?” effectively removing a tenet of the Constitution without so much as an amendment to be ratified being proposed and presented to the States.

Many liberals and lukewarm Christians who support this invasion accuse those opposed as “being unchristian,” bigots, racists, Islamophobes and recite part of the Statue of Liberty inscription “Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free” as some indication of an “open door” policy. France gave “Lady Liberty,” made by a Frenchman, as a gift to the US with that inscription in place. However, that inscription did not say, “in violation of US laws, at the behest of one individual, one nation or one entity, and to the detriment of the people and national sovereignty.”

*Article by Suzanne Hamner

The Washington Standard

Previous post

Unbelievable! When a Father Picks Up His Daughter from School Because a Boy Put Super Glue in Her Hair, A Cop Threatens Him with This

Next post

Obama and His Latest Gun Grab Attempt