Home»US»Truth the Lawless Anti-Trump “Protestors” Need to Know About Popular Vote

Truth the Lawless Anti-Trump “Protestors” Need to Know About Popular Vote

Pinterest WhatsApp

Unless you’ve been living in an alternate dimension since the election results were announced early in the morning hours of November 9th, you’ve no doubt heard that Hillary Clinton “allegedly” won the popular vote. The reason I say “allegedly” won, is because no matter how many times the mainstream media wants to report that Hillary indisputably won the popular vote, there are at LEAST two independent nonpartisan groups, VoteFraud.org and watchdog.org, that both claim claim approximately 7 million of Hillary’s votes came from illegal aliens or dead people (NOTE TO LIBERALS: Regardless of what Obama says, neither is eligible to vote).

The reason I say you’ve “no doubt heard,” is because there are 86,400 seconds in a single 24-hour day, but don’t think something as trivial as Father Time has been able to stop the liberal mainstream media from reporting several million times a day, all day, every day since the election, that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote.

If like me, you’re tired of hearing about how Hillary won the popular vote, you’re tired of demonstrations causing problems where you live, you’re tired of hearing about how “faithless electors” are going to change their votes from Trump to Hillary on December 19th when the Electoral College meets to make the results official, and you’re tired of hearing about how the Electoral College is an antiquated system that needs to be abolished, consider this post your one-stop shop to get the information you need to confront any unshowered liberal mob holding up traffic in your city while they march and mumble their worthless drivel about the popular vote, and set the record straight.

In the following video, first I set the record straight about the lies and misdirection being pumped out around the clock by the mainstream liberal media using a brilliant article written by Derek Hunter at Town Hall, and another by Donna Carol Voss at The Federalist. To put it politely, both articles eviscerate the narrative that the media is reporting about Hillary’s popular vote win.

Next, I cover how the recount effort looks like it has fizzled out as fast as it began, with the effort running into a brick wall in Pennsylvania, and also with reports of massive voter fraud in Wisconsin, a state Trump won notwithstanding the fraud. Finally, I cover reports about electors living in fear for the safety of their families because of the sheer volume of threats they are receiving (including death threats), from the “tolerant” left, and disgruntled Hillary supporters.


Derek Hunter at Town Hall writes:

Have you heard the news that Hillary Clinton won the popular vote? Unless you live under a rockyou likely have stumbled across a barista or aspiring novelist mumbling something about how the Electoral College is unfair and undemocratic and how electors should follow “the will of the people” and vote for Hillary on Dec. 19. Because “democracy!” or something.

If we lived in a democracy, they’d have a point. Thankfully, we do not. 

What too many of these uneducated and unshowered drum circlers don’t know, or don’t care to know, is the popular vote is a meaningless unit of measure. The Electoral College exists, and it is how we determine who is president. We are a union of states, hence the name United States of America, not singular blob on a map. Candidates must appeal to a broad swath of the nation with differing and sometimes conflicting interests. It’s a brilliant system.

Donald Trump didn’t campaign in California because there was no point in campaigning in California. Unless Los Angeles and San Francisco fell into the ocean, the state wasn’t in play. This left a lot of potential Republican voters deciding to skip the lines on Election Day. Same goes for New York.

More nefariously, Democratic pundits and journalists have expanded the deception of the presidential popular vote to Congress as well. “Democrats got more votes for the Senate than Republicans, yet the GOP controls it. That’s not fair!” – or some such childish refrain has been making the rounds on social media and TV since people voted.

Just like the “recount” is a naked attempt to discredit Trump’s victory, this “smart take” is a deliberate deception designed to keep the unshowered angry. 

The Nation magazine put it this way, “The preliminary count had Democratic Senate candidates gathering 46.2 million votes to 39.3 million for Republican candidates.” That and $2.50 will get you a cup of coffee from the aforementioned unshowered, probably with earlobes stretched to the size of Frisbees and an impromptu lecture on the “justice” of fair trade coffee beans.

But it’s a fraud.




Those numbers aren’t a lie, per se, but how the left is using them is, just like how it is using the presidential popular vote.

In California now, all candidates run in the same primary, and the top two vote-getters advance to the runoff unless one receives more than 50 percent of the vote. Thanks to total Democratic Party control, both candidates for the open Senate seat were Democrats. So Democrats got all the votes in California’s Senate race.

Meanwhile, Texas, which has a large population and generally votes Republican, did not have a Senate race this year. So millions of votes that could have gone to Republican Senate candidates didn’t because there was no election for them to vote in.

In fact, several solidly Republican states or states Republicans stand a good chance of winning didn’t have Senate elections in 2016. 

When you choose the unit of measure by which you determine success you will always come out ahead. That’s what Democrats are doing here.

In this year’s World Series, the Chicago Cubs won the title 4 games to 3. But both the Cubs and Cleveland Indians scored 27 runs in the seven games. Applying the argument liberals are using, there needs to be an eighth game, or at least more innings added to game 7 with the winner being whichever team scores the next run.

That doesn’t make any sense, and neither does arguing about the popular vote for president or in regards to Congress. The rules were the rules, and campaigns were run under those rules, deliberately. 

This won’t stop the unshowered and uneducated. Their ignorance inoculates them from such realities. But it doesn’t excuse the showered and educated who should, and do, know better. 

The political class is doing all it can to hurt the incoming Republican government; to discredit it before anyone takes their oaths of office. C-list celebrities have even taken to social media to promote a meaningless online petition to “pressure” Trump electors to switch their votes to Hillary (and avoid keeping their word to leave the country). Many of the great unwashed have even taken to threatening the lives of Trump electors, which is illegal but of no interest to the current Justice Department. Unable to win at the ballot box, these are the tactics they’ve chosen. It’s who they are.

Outside of their enclaves, Democrats have little appeal. They can’t win under the rules, so they do what they always do – ignore them. Be it through a bogus recount trying to deny enough Electoral College electors for Trump to reach 270 votes (he’d still win without them from the three states the Greens and Clinton are challenging, it would just empower Democrats to claim he didn’t have 270, or the widely known “majority”), or the “we won more votes” congressional nonsense. Democrats have never lost well.


For anyone with a sincere desire to be more informed, and to learn the factual and legal rebuttals to virtually every ridiculous reason liberals say the Electoral Collage needs to be abolished (the reasons that always get captured in 30 second sound bites and replayed on the evening news over and over for the useful idiots to hear, and then repeat like parrots during their “demonstrations”), I suggest reading an article from The Federalist which writes:

If you want to get rid of the Electoral College, you don’t understand how it works. I mean the royal “you,” not the partisan “you.” Opposition to the Electoral College tends to break down along partisan lines—especially lately, for some reason—but even President-elect Donald Trump said he’d prefer “simple votes.”

You can hardly be blamed for your ignorance if you went to public school, attended an elite university, or get your news from Yahoo. Some very nice, apparently well-educated people—Barbara Boxer—are peddling absolute Pablum about the Electoral College. “The Electoral College is an outdated, undemocratic system that does not reflect our modern society, and it needs to change immediately. Every American should be guaranteed that their vote counts.”

You are one of them, with all due respect, if you’ve said or thought any of the following…


Your News Wire Reports:

Officials involved in the Wisconsin recount have come forward with evidence of tampered voting machines that they say proves Hillary Clinton rigged the election. 

Election observers designated on behalf of Jill Stein have shared images on social media showing nine voting machines with tampered seals.

Palmerreport.com reports:

The observer, named Wendy, has been observing the recount in St. Croix County. According to the state’s official election website, that county is currently doing both a hand recount and a machine recount.

That’s what makes it notable that Wendy spotted the broken seals on five of the nine machines in question.

Based on the photographs she posted to Stein’s official campaign website, the broken seals themselves come with the warning label that “Removal of seal voids warranty.” Take a look at one of her photos below:


There has as of yet been no explanation from Wisconsin officials or St. Croix County officials as towhy the majority of vote counting machines in the county have been visibly tampered with, and no one noticed during the original vote tally.

It’s possible that these seals could have been broken by a hacker who was reprogramming them to produce rigged or false vote totals, and it’s also possible that an election worker could have simply pried open the seals for some unknown reason that didn’t involve malicious intent. But in any case, the broken tamper seals stand out as alarming – and could serve as legal fodder for expanding the scope of the recount.




A judge ruled that there was insufficient evidence to force every Wisconsin county to do a hand recount, and that each county could decide on its own whether to do hand recounts or machine recounts. Sixty of the seventy-two counties have voluntarily agreed to do hand recounts.

However, of the twelve counties which refused, Donald Trump won nine of them. These tampered seals could be used to convince the judge to order the remaining twelve counties to do hand recounts.

SouthFront Reports:

A Darknet website, launched earlier this week, collects donations to help organize the assassination of President-elect Donald Trump and his future Vice President Mike Pence.

A website on the Darknet, launched earlier this week, warns of the “political, environmental and social consequences” of the future presidency of Donald Trump and collects donations to allegedly help organize the assassination of both Trump and Vice President-elect Mike Pence,Infowars reported on Friday.

“As you are all well aware, the consequences of having Donald Trump and Mike Prence as the leaders of the free world are extremely dangerous,” the webpage reads. “The political, environmental and social consequences will change the United States for the worst.”


According to information provided on the website, the group, organized donations, belongs to “a well-known underground organization,” which previously preferred to influence on “crooked governments,” using cyber attacks, but now decided to shift its tactics to physical violence.

“We are part of a well-known underground organization that always defended and protected the rights of all people against crooked governments and regimes using different cyber attacks, but not, we have to go further as it will require much more than cyber attack to defend ourselves to avoid civil war or another world war.”

The website asks to donate Bitcoin, which allegedly will be used for buying equipment and paying bribes to the federal government and even the Secret Service. According to CSO writer Steve Ragan, since March 2016, the group managed to collect more than $88,000 on its Bitcoin wallet. However, since the assassination website was launched, only $119 has been donated.

The website also provides a Darknet-based email address for those, who want to provide expertise or intelligence to the group.

According to Infowars, investigations into such Darknet websites have revealed them to be likely scams or run by law enforcement, despite its provocative nature.

Article posted with permission from The Last Great Stand

The Washington Standard

Previous post

Who is Behind “Fake News”? Mainstream Media Use Fake Videos and Images

Next post

Are We Being Set Up For A Crash? Stocks Hit A Level Only Seen During The Bubbles Of 1929, 2000 And 2007