The United Nations and Democrats across America, along with some Republicans, are working to use “school choice” tax-funding for home education and private schools to bring it all under the control of government, warned The New American magazine Senior Editor Alex Newman. Arizona, recently touted as the “model” for school choice, is exhibit A, but far from alone. Under a Democrat plan there, everyone taking government money must submit to government standards, testing, and more. The rest of the jurisdictions that adopted government funding for “choice” are likely to follow, as UNESCO called for in a report.
Show Comments
- Buy All-American!
- Bring health and vitality back to your body with these non-transdermal patches
- Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
- How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation - Use promo code TIM to save $$$
- The Very Best All-American Made Supplements On The Market
- Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Save with Promo Code TIM
- Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
- Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
- Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
- The Very Best Chlorine Dioxide
- All-American, US Prime, High Choice Grass-Fed Beef with NO mRNA, hormones or antibiotics... ever!
“We Will Not Comply,” Governors Tell Biden & World Health Organization
Leave a Comment / By Liberty Sentinel Staff / September 9, 2024
Republican governors are telling Joe Biden and the globalists at the United Nations to pound sand even as foreign governments move away from the U.S. dollar and Russia warns of possible World War III on American soil, reports journalist Alex Newman on today’s episode of The Sentinel Report. Also, journalist and author Troy Anderson joins the show to discuss the startling mysteries surrounding Donald Trump, an 1800s children’s book, …and Nikolai Tesla!? Plus, homeschooling is becoming a worldwide phenomenon as parents across the West seek a more traditional, Christian way of raising their kids. The founder of Transition Education, Ana Maria Bagnuoli, joins the show to reveal more. Last but not least, Sentinel Report regular Dr. Dave Janda joins Alex to talk about the alarming prospect of RUSSIAN NUCLEAR MISSLES destroying the United States. You don’t want to miss this jam-packed episode of The Sentinel Report!
Show Comments
Deep State War on Farmers
Leave a Comment / By Liberty Sentinel Staff / September 9, 2024
Farmers and ranchers around the world have a bullseye on their operations as Big Business and Big Government join forces to transform the food supply and centralize control, warns journalist Alex Newman in this episode of Behind The Deep State. From South Africa and Brazil to China and the West, the pretexts for destroying independent food producers vary. But the end goal is the same everywhere: Total control of humanity. Learn about this evil so you can sound the alarm and protect our food security before it’s too late.
Show Comments
SPECIAL REPORT: Open Season, Without Farmers and Ranchers, What’s Next?
Leave a Comment / By Alex Newman / September 6, 2024
Cattle rancher Debbie Bacigalupi is working overtime to protect her family’s Northern California ranch. It’s not just the government’s newly “reintroduced” wolves or the poorly managed government forests burning up that threaten to destroy it. To Bacigalupi and other embattled ranchers in the Klamath River Basin, it seems like costly new decrees, orders, laws, and regulations are lurking around every corner. It has gotten so bad that farmers and ranchers are not sure how much more they will be able to withstand. Most recently, authorities undertook the largest dam removal project in history, all but destroying a major source of water and electricity to the rural communities. Under the guise of allowing salmon to swim freely, state and federal officials are destroying the dams that in many ways make the area habitable for people and many animals. The dam removal is expected to be finished before fall. But total control of all water across the entire Klamath River Basin—home to countless farmers and ranchers—has already begun. The “full basin management” scheme now looms over the livelihood of producers in the area. Meanwhile, the California State Water Resources Control Board has repeatedly targeted the Bacigalupi ranch for so-called violations. After approving their livestock-watering pond more than 15 years ago, the state now insists the ranch must redo and resubmit the plans to be reapproved. Apparently, the water control bureaucracy was understaffed at the time of the original application—though not too understaffed to collect the yearly water permitting fees, Bacigalupi tells RANGE magazine. And so, at great expense, the family must jump through all the hoops again. Bacigalupi can barely contain her frustration. “They will probably either tell us we owe a bunch of money that we can’t afford, or that we need to destroy our pond,” she says, noting that authorities admitted to using satellite imagery to surveil her family’s private property. “We are constantly dealing with this kind of stuff. We’re just surrounded by the intensifying pressure. You keep wondering when the next shoe is going to drop. You can never just enjoy the scenery, the warm wind blowing in your hair, because you’re always wondering what these agencies are going to do next—what is the next trick up their sleeves? The reality is they want your land and they want your water.”
Bacigalupi is just one of countless ranchers in Northern California and around the world who feel like they are under siege. Of course, they are. All over the planet, those who feed humanity are under attack, literally. Under various pretexts, governments and international organizations such as the United Nations and the World Economic Forum are waging a full-blown war on farmers and ranchers—especially small-scale and independent producers. Different tools, policies, and excuses are being used depending on the country. From pursuing “racial justice” and “environmental justice” to protecting “endangered species” or the “climate,” not to mention “economic efficiency,” the guises employed by governments vary widely. But the goal is the same everywhere: Destroy independent food producers and centralize control of all agriculture, land, and energy—and ultimately, political and economic power with them.
This writer first noticed something sinister was going on with respect to farmers in 2012 upon hearing then-South African President Jacob Zuma singing, “Bring me my machine gun, we are going to shoot the Boer.” The Boers, of course, are a specific ethnic group descended mostly from the Dutch. But Boer in Dutch means farmer. And plenty of leaders such as Julius Malema, then leader of the ruling party’s youth league, regularly chanted songs such as “Kill the farmer.” Even as Zuma and other senior leaders were singing about slaughtering Boers, South African farmers, among the most productive in the world, were being massacred in unbelievable numbers and in the most horrific ways. Analysts estimate that as many as 10 percent of the nation’s commercial farmers have been murdered (and often tortured) as the government and even the foreign media ignore it. The situation got so bad that the world’s top expert on genocide, Gregory Stanton of Genocide Watch, warned that genocidal forces were at stage six of eight on the genocide scale. Stage seven is slaughter and stage eight is denial after the fact. “There is direct evidence of SA [South African] government incitement to genocide,” Stanton said after a fact-finding mission.
The next year, authorities in Brazil began displacing entire farming villages across some of its most productive agricultural areas. Brazilian troops, some of them wearing U.N. insignia, ordered the residents—at gunpoint—to dismantle their ramshackle homes and load everything into trucks. No compensation was offered to property owners as multiple towns were wiped off the map. Officially, the far-left government’s operation was designed to return lands to native tribes that supposedly lived on or at least passed through it centuries ago. Ironically, leaders of the Xavante tribe who were supposed to be the beneficiaries of the landgrab denounced it, saying their ancestors had never lived on that land or even in that ecosystem. Around half a million acres of prime farmland were taken out of production—a precursor to similar schemes that would be pursued later. In Communist China, meanwhile, government officials are already moving peasants off their ancestral lands and farms at gunpoint. Dubbed the “National New-type Urbanization Plan (2014-2020),” the scheme aims to move 250 million people into tightly controlled cities by 2026. Countless villages have already been razed as the regime promises that government-controlled corporate megafarms will be more productive. Starting more recently, the socialist regime ruling Sri Lanka, acting on U.N. instructions, banned chemical fertilizers and modern agricultural technologies under the guise of “sustainability.” “This has created opportunities for innovation and investment into organic agriculture that will be healthier and more sustainable in the future,” declared now-deposed “president” Gotabaya Rajapaksa at a 2021 U.N. climate summit. In reality, food production collapsed, along with the nation’s economy, as the government was overthrown amid mass hunger.
Even more recently, Western governments from Canada and Holland to Germany and beyond have declared war on their food producers. In the Netherlands, one of the top agricultural exporters in the world, authorities decided to slash “nitrogen emissions” to supposedly save the environment. To accomplish that, authorities are working to expropriate a third or more of the nation’s farms, many of which have been handed down in families for centuries. “The expropriation plans of the cabinet are a downright declaration of war on the agricultural sector,” says Dutch member of Parliament Gideon van Meijeren with the Forum for Democracy party. “Under false pretenses, farmers are being robbed of their land, centuries-old farms are being demolished and farmers’ families are being totally destroyed.” While the Dutch election secured a new ruling coalition that vowed to roll back many of the attacks on farmers and “green” climate schemes of the last few years, European farmers are hardly in the clear yet.
Of course, the war is in America too. One man who has been on the front line of the battle is Brett Kenzy, a South Dakota rancher and president of Ranchers-Cattlemen Action Legal Fund United Stockgrowers of America (R-CALF USA). As the leader of the nation’s largest producer-only membership association for independent cattle and sheep producers, Kenzy has been sounding the alarm about what is going on for years. “America must realize that we became a net food importer in 2019,” Kenzy tells RANGE. “We’ve lost half our cow-calf producers, 70 percent of independent feeders like me in the last generation, 106,000 cattle producers in the last five years alone. These have not been ‘screw it, I’m cashing in and buying a house on the lake’ sales. These have been tearful dispersions of the end of often multigenerational American dreams.” Kenzy, who warns that America must kick out “the U.N. and its cronies” from U.S. food production, also explains that totalitarians such as Stalin and Mao already tried to seize control of food production—with horrific results. And yet today the effort to try it again is gaining steam. “The war on farming and ranching,” he says, “could be described as ‘farming the farmers and ranching the ranchers’ through centralized global control.”
In America, as in other parts of the world, the war on farmers and ranchers has been multifaceted. It is being waged through government policy, anticompetitive behavior by establishment-backed megacorporations, and other means. And the assaults just keep coming. The latest shoe to drop: “disease traceback,” which R-CALF describes as a “pretext to strip away freedoms, liberties, and property.” Before that, there was the Endangered Species Act. The infamous Bundy Ranch showdown actually had its origins in 1989 when U.S. authorities claimed the desert tortoise was endangered, effectively putting a giant target on the backs of local ranchers. At the time of the designation, there were more than 50 cattle ranches in the southern Nevada county where the Bundy ranch operated. Ranchers were ordered to limit their cattle grazing on lands many of them had used since the 1800s. By the time of the showdown, the Bundy ranch was the last cattle ranch in the area. The only reason it survived is because of a massive outcry that saw heavily armed volunteers from across the nation descend on the area to stand up to federal bullies determined to drive the family off its land. Similar persecution was used against the Hammonds in Oregon, though the pretext there was “protecting” a wildlife refuge.
More recently, the Biden administration sought to impose “climate” regulations on public companies that would have effectively required farmers and ranchers to “disclose” their “emissions” or be shut out of the market. The Clean Water Act has also become a weapon in the hands of federal bureaucrats waging war on producers. And more tools to wield against rural America are being dreamed up and manufactured even now. All this has contributed to the fact that the number of farms in the United States is plummeting. From a peak of almost seven million in 1935, there are now well under two million farms left, with government regulations and heavily subsidized corporate megafarms increasingly displacing those still standing. The decline also seems to be accelerating. The most recent data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture show that from 2017 to 2022, the number of farms fell by around seven percent. That is approximately the number of farms lost during the preceding 20 years. The number of acres in agricultural production also declined by about 20 million over the five-year period starting in 2017, even as the American population continued growing rapidly due to immigration.
Similar trends are occurring globally. According to a study published last year in the journal Nature Sustainability, the number of farms around the world will decrease from 616 million in 2020 to just 272 million by the end of this century if current trends continue. “We see a turning point from widespread farm creation to widespread consolidation on a global level, and that’s the future trajectory that humanity is currently on,” says study author Zia Mehrabi, professor of environmental studies at Colorado University, Boulder. He warned that this posed significant risks to humanity. The official narrative is that nebulous “market forces” are largely driving these changes. There may be some truth to that, if the current government-dominated agricultural sector can even be considered a market anymore. But the reality is far more sinister. There is, in fact, a global effort to “transform food systems” and centralize control in the hands of Big Business and Big Government. Much of this is taking place under the guise of sustainable development, as RANGE documented in the Summer 2024 issue under the headline “In the Crosshairs.” Indeed, virtually every element of the global war on farmers can be linked back to one of the U.N.’s 17 “Sustainable Development Goals,” frequently referred to as “Agenda 2030.” Celebrated as the “master plan for humanity” by top U.N. officials when it was adopted by U.N. member governments in 2015, the plan seeks to “transform our world,” with a special emphasis on agriculture, lands, and related fields. The global plan seeks everything from global wealth redistribution (Goal 10) to education that gets children to promote controversial U.N.-backed ideologies such as sustainable development (Goal 4).
One of the critical elements of the plan is bringing about “fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services.” Nowhere are those changes more dramatic than in agriculture and food production. Goal 12, for example, demands “sustainable consumption and production patterns,” especially in agriculture, and “sustainable management and efficient use of natural resources.” The U.N. plan also commits governments to “environmentally sound management of chemicals and all wastes throughout their life cycle, in accordance with agreed international frameworks.” Goal 14 addresses “marine pollution of all kinds, in particular from land-based activities, including…nutrient pollution.” In other words, agriculture is a threat to the ocean, the climate, natural resources, and more. The U.N. Food & Agriculture Organization (FAO), led by a member of the Chinese Communist Party, outlined its vision right before Agenda 2030 was adopted in its 2014 report, “Building a Common Vision for Sustainable Food and Agriculture: Principles and Approaches.” The document demands drastic restrictions on the use of fertilizers, pesticides, emissions, and water across the agricultural value chain. As an example of how agriculture must be reformed to be considered sustainable by the United Nations, the FAO report declares that “excessive use of nitrogen fertilizer is a major cause of water pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.” With that in mind, Goal 2 demands “sustainable agriculture” and “sustainable food production.” On a related effort, Goal 6 requires “sustainable management of water”—especially in agriculture.
Big Business is firmly onboard. In 2019, the World Economic Forum signed a “strategic partnership” with the United Nations to bring the global business world onboard in promoting Agenda 2030. And through initiatives such as its Food Innovation Hubs and the Food Action Alliance, it is working fiendishly on a global transformation of agriculture toward a system controlled by Big Government and Big Business. Bill Gates, the Rockefeller dynasty, and other major elitists, mostly operating through tax-exempt foundations, are also at the center of the global transformation. Genetic modification of everything so that DNA of crops, livestock, and more can be owned by megacorporations is at the center of the centralization process being pushed by the constellation of billionaire-controlled “nonprofit” organizations. But the sustainability agenda goes back half a century. Among the first official gatherings on the subject was the U.N. Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat I) that adopted the Vancouver Declaration. The agreement stated that “land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals.”
Perhaps even more alarming, the controversial U.N. agreement argued that private land ownership is “a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth, therefore contributes to social injustice.” As such, the declaration continued, “public control of land use is therefore indispensable,” an ominous foreshadowing of the World Economic Forum’s now famous “prediction” that by 2030, “You’ll own nothing.” Then U.S. National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger contemplated in the early 1970s using food as a weapon of foreign policy to get governments to limit population. It seems the tactic remains in vogue among the would-be ruling class. In addition to food, a similar war on energy exploration and production is being waged by the United Nations, the U.S. government, and other nefarious forces—and despite claims about “protecting the climate,” it appears to be aimed at the same goal.
While U.N. and U.S. government officials whine about what percentage of global emissions supposedly come from agriculture, they fail to even acknowledge that agriculture produces the food that keeps humanity going. This is an existential threat to America, freedom, and even to mankind. Experts and advocates told RANGE that this battle is critical. There are many ways to resist the global effort to undermine independent agricultural producers. When asked by RANGE how people could push back, R-CALF president Kenzy suggested getting started by educating consumers and the general public about the plight of farmers and ranchers. Then consumers should be encouraged to shop as locally as possible, to buy American, and to demand competitive markets rather than cronyism. The first step in addressing the crisis is raising public awareness about the threat. If Americans understood what was happening, they would demand action from their elected representatives at the state and federal levels. They would also make different purchasing decisions. This is not just about steak, though. The future of humanity and freedom are literally at stake.
This was a collaboration with RANGE Magazine, check them out by clicking below!
Show Comments
Wisconsin Voters Dismantle Our Republic
1 Comment / By Brandon Semrow / September 6, 2024
On August 13, 2024 Wisconsin primary voters had the choice to either adopt or reject two constitutional amendments. Question 1 would prohibit the legislature from delegating their power of appropriating money, and question two would require approval of the legislature to spend federal funds. The legislature placed them on the ballot after large amounts of waste were found in how the pandemic relief funds from the federal government were spent.
The State of Wisconsin Legislative Audit Bureau issued a report in December 2022 in which they said, “Federal law provides the State with the discretion to spend $4.5 billion of the $5.7 billion in supplemental federal funds, but federal law requires that $1.1 billion be spent for specified purposes, such as on particular programs that state agencies administer…Statutes provide the Governor with the authority to decide how to spend discretionary federal funds provided to the State. As of June 30, 2022, $1.8 billion in discretionary funds were remaining. In December 2022, DOA indicated it had plans for using most of these funds. Federal law permits some supplemental federal funds to be spent through December 2026. We recommend that DOA increase the transparency and clarity of the State’s use of supplemental federal funds, including by documenting how decisions were made to use discretionary funds for particular state programs. DOA should also include on its website additional information about supplemental federal funds, including plans for spending the remaining funds and how such plans change over time. Providing clear and comprehensive information will allow legislators and the public to more readily identify how these funds are spent in the future.”
One of the groups that advocated against passage of the amendments was The Nature Conservancy, with their Protect Wisconsin’s Constitution-Vote No campaign. They sent text messages that said the following: VOTE NO to MAGA Politicians. VOTE NO on Question 1. VOTE NO ON QUESTION 2. VOTE TODAY ON THE BACK OF YOUR BALOT. Their website states the following, “TNC’s work depends on support from federal grants and partnerships. In 2023 alone, TNC partners and conservation initiatives received more than $20 million from federal sources now at risk:
$11 million in 2023 for the Pelican River Forest Project, protecting 56,911 acres of land
$11 million for National Fish and Wildlife Foundation projects in 2023.
As a science-based, community-centered and nonpartisan organization, speaking up on a statewide ballot initiative like this is somewhat rare for us. We are proud of our track record of working with leaders on both sides of the political aisle—we’ve been doing it for over 64 years—but we feel we can’t stay quiet on this issue given the potential impacts to our work and to the work of our many conservation partners across the state. There is a lot on the line on August 13th.”
Wisconsin Democracy Campaign also advocated against the passage of both questions. According to their website, their mission statement is the following:
“We are dedicated to clean and open government and a full democracy, where everyone has an equal voice. Who We Are and What We Do: We’re a nonprofit, nonpartisan watchdog that tracks and exposes money in politics in Wisconsin. We provide the premier searchable database of campaign donations in the state. We are the only group that systematically tracks election spending by outside groups. We post original stories on money and politics on our website, and work with the media to convey our information and educate the public. We advocate for transparency and for reforms that level the electoral playing field. We defend our civil rights and liberties. We offer a vision of a democracy with equal participation, racial equity, and economic justice.”
It’s funny that they claim to “advocate for transparency” and track and expose money in politics in Wisconsin, and at the same time urged people to vote no to supposedly protect separation of powers, given that they were advocating against amendments that would have required federal funds received by the state to go through the normal appropriations process, which requires a public hearing and a vote by the representatives of the people! This is likely because of the partisan makeup of the Governor’s office. If the opposite party occupied the governor’s mansion, the narrative may have been completely different!
After the election, they posted the following message on their website:
“Wisconsin Democracy Campaign is proud to join the Wisconsin Fair Maps Coalition in fighting back against the conservative power grab on our rights–ultimately leading our efforts to safeguard our constitution.
“On behalf of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign and the Fair Maps Coalition, we extend our deepest gratitude to every voter who participated in yesterday’s critical election and especially to those who voted “No” on the proposed constitutional amendments. Your voice and your vote have helped to safeguard the principles that form the foundation of our democracy,” said Nick Ramos, Executive Director of the Wisconsin Democracy Campaign.
Wisconsin Democracy Campaign played a pivotal role in deploying resources and executive programs to help educate voters on the constitutional amendments. Wisconsin Democracy Campaign’s Commitment to the August Vote No Effort:
Deployed a six figure text message campaign that resulted in over 1.6 million texts sent to Wisconsinites all across our state. Engaged over 200 volunteers who mailed 25,000 handwritten postcards to voters. Deployed a relational organizing program that resulted in over 2,500 engagements. Nearly 1,000 handwritten letters by volunteers. Organized educational events.
As we move forward, we remain committed to upholding the values that we believe in and ensuring that Wisconsin continues to be a place where democracy thrives. This victory is a testament to what can be achieved when we come together for a common purpose.”
Their website further states, “The Wisconsin Democracy Campaign, with an annual budget of $566,000, is currently funded by grants from: The Brico Fund, The Brookby Foundation, The Brown Family Foundation, Center for Artistic Activism, The Evjue Foundation, The Joyce Foundation, The Hopewell Fund, League of Women Voters of Wisconsin, Movement Voter Project, The Proteus Fund, SEIU Wisconsin State Council, State Voices, along with tax-deductible gifts from individual donors.”
The fact that Wisconsin Democracy Campaign called the ballot questions a “conservative power grab” and claimed that they were leading an effort to “safeguard our constitution” is laughable at best! They are only undermining their own credibility by saying that it is a power grab to require the governor to get approval from the people’s representatives before money is spent! In reality they are the ones working against safeguarding our constitution because the state constitution says that the legislature appropriates money. Allowing the governor to unilaterally spend money would be allowing him to act as a king and trample upon the separation of powers! When our constitution was written, it was never assumed that the state would be receiving any money from the federal government in the first place. The reason this became such a big issue is the large amounts of federal dollars that were allocated to the states during the covid pandemic, and current Wisconsin law allows for the governor to have discretion over how federal relief funds are spent, despite our constitutional requirement that the legislature appropriate money.
In reality if the state and federal constitutions were obeyed, questions 1 and 2 would not have been necessary in the first place! If the federal government were kept within its constitutional limits of the enumerated powers delegated to it by the constitution, there would not be any federal tax dollars sent back to the states at all. On top of that, Article IV Section IV of the U.S. Constitution says, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government”. This means that all state governments must be in the form of a republic. In a republic, the chief executive may not spend money or enact any other law without approval from the people’s representatives in the legislature, as this would violate the separation of powers doctrine that is based on the Maxim of Montesquieu. In Federalist 47, James Madison said, “From these facts which Montesquieu was guided, it may clearly be inferred that, in saying, “There can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or body of magistrates…When the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person or body, there can be no liberty, because the apprehensions may arise lest the same monarch or senate should enact tyrannical laws to execute them in a tyrannical manner.”
While defending how the state governments were currently in the form of a republic, in Federalist 48 Madison goes on to state, “It is agreed on all sides, that the powers properly belonging to one of the departments ought not to be directly and completely administered by either of the other departments… The legislative department alone has access to the pockets of the people, and has in some constitutions full discretion, and in all a prevailing influence, over the pecuniary rewards of those who fill the other departments…”
It could be argued that congress should fulfill its Article IV duty in ensuring that the states have a republican form of government by passing a law requiring that emergency funds allocated to the states, be appropriated by the legislature and not spent through a unilateral decision made by the governor!
If liberty is to be preserved, the American people must ensure not only that our federal government remains a republic, but that our state governments do as well! In a democracy, majority rules and rights and liberties can be voted away with a 50% plus 1 vote. In Federalist No. 10 James Madison said, “democracies have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security, or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they are violent in their deaths.” John Adams had the following to say about democracy, “Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There never was a democracy yet that did not commit suicide.”
John Birch Society founder Robert Welch wrote in his treatise Republics & Democracies that the Framers of the Constitution specifically wished to prevent democracy in America:
“The word democracy had not occurred in the Declaration of Independence, and does not appear in the constitution of a single one of our fifty states — which constitutions are derived mainly from the thinking of the Founding Fathers of the Republic — for the same reason. They knew all about democracies, and if they had wanted one for themselves and their posterity, they would have founded one. Look at all the elaborate system of checks and balances which they established; at the carefully worked-out protective clauses of the Constitution itself, and especially of the first ten amendments, known as the Bill of Rights; at the effort, as Jefferson put it, to “bind men down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution,” and thus to solidify the rule not of men but of laws. All of these steps were taken deliberately to avoid and to prevent a democracy, or any of the worst features of a democracy, in the United States of America.”
The dangers of democracy that we face are too great to be ignored. With proper civics education, our state would not be in this situation in the first place. Every election season we hear how someone or something is a “threat to democracy”. Groups like Wisconsin Democracy Campaign advocate to make this a “place where democracy thrives” and where “everyone has an equal voice”. If we continue to let our republic fall down the path of decay, it is a sure thing that a system of majority rule manipulated and deceived by propaganda will trample upon individual rights, and our system of checks and balances along with the separation of powers will cease to exist. So, to those who called questions 1 and 2 a threat to democracy, I say good, I’m glad! Because we’re not a democracy, we’re a republic!
Brandon is a freelance journalist based in the metro-Milwaukee area. He has worked full-time in politics for five years. This includes leading successful campaigns for legislatures at the state and congressional levels, and successful deployments to get bills passed in Kentucky and Texas. He is currently working as a carpenter. On his spare time, he enjoys weightlifting, running, hiking, and listening to classic rock.
Show Comments
1 thought on “Wisconsin Voters Dismantle Our Republic”
m Evil BG’s is full of flatulence and fake science. His real plan; starve the masses, so he can control the globe. Luciferian worshipper. Reply
US Governors: “We Will Not Comply” With UN WHO Power Grab
1 Comment / By Alex Newman / September 5, 2024
More than half of the nation’s governors declared publicly that they will not comply with the United Nations World Health Organization (UN WHO) and its attempt to usurp vast new powers, a response to enormous public pressure to protect liberty and sovereignty in the face of a historic global power grab by the organization and the forces behind it.
“The World Health Organization is attempting one world control over health policy with their new ‘Pandemic Agreement’,” declared the 26 GOP governors in a joint statement. “Put simply, Republican Governors will not comply.”
In a letter to Joe Biden, the governors blasted the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations and the International Pandemic Accord (or treaty) being negotiated by governments and the WHO.
The two instruments would purport to grant “unprecedented and unconstitutional powers over the United States and its people” to the UN agency, they explained. “These proposed changes could drastically change the role of governors in response to their charge as the state health officials.”
“The objective of these instruments is to empower the WHO, particularly its uncontrollable Director-General, with the authority to restrict the rights of U.S. citizens, including freedoms such as speech, privacy, travel, choice of medical care, and informed consent, thus violating our Constitution’s core principles,” they added.
The governors also lambasted the plot to grant broad new emergency powers to the former ethno-Marxist terror leader running the WHO as well as the surveillance regime called for under the schemes. They slammed the erosion of state and national sovereignty, too.
“As governors, we affirm that public health policy is a matter reserved for the states, not the federal government, and certainly not international bodies like the WHO,” they added. “We are committed to resisting any attempts to transfer authority to the WHO over public policy affecting our citizens
or any efforts by the WHO to assert such authority over them.”
Signatories of the letter include: Governor Kay Ivey (AL), Governor Mike Dunleavy (AK), Governor Sarah Sanders (AR), Governor Ron DeSantis (FL), Governor Brian Kemp (GA), Governor Brad Little (ID), Governor Eric Holcomb (IN), Governor Kim Reynolds (IA), Governor Jeff Landry (LA), Governor Tate Reeves (MS), Governor Mike Parson (MO), Governor Greg Gianforte (MT), Governor Jim Pillen (NE), Governor Joe Lombardo (NV), Governor Chris Sununu (NH), Governor Doug Burgum (ND), Governor Mike DeWine (OH), Governor Kevin Stitt (OK), Governor Henry McMaster (SC), Governor Kristi Noem (SD), Governor Bill Lee (TN), Governor Greg Abbott (TX), Governor Spencer Cox (UT), Governor Glenn Youngkin (VA), Governor Jim Justice (WV), and Governor Mark Gordon (WY).
Show Comments
1 thought on “US Governors: “We Will Not Comply” With UN WHO Power Grab”
- StBernardnot Proud to be an Iowan! Reply
Presidential Politics & Minnesota’s Marxist Teacher Licensing Rules
1 Comment / By Allen and Julie Quist / September 4, 2024
Child Protection League has been exposing and opposing Minnesota’s new Marxist teacher licensing standards for over two years. Our battle exploded onto the national scene last week when Joy Pullman, executive editor of The Federalist, published her article ‘Minnesota Poised To Ban Christians, Muslims, and Jews From Teaching In Public Schools.’ With Governor Walz now campaigning as the Vice-Presidential candidate beside Presidential candidate Kamela Harris, the national spotlight is suddenly shining on Minnesota. We welcome the attention and the opportunity for the whole world to learn about Tim Walz’s Marxist takeover of Minnesota’s education system. Everyone must understand that Tim Walz is a dangerous man.
Multiple major news organizations such as Judicial Watch, World Net Daily, Gateway Pundit, Infowars, Trending Politics, LifeSiteNews, and innumerable others quickly picked up the story with reprints, reposts, shares, or restatements of The Federalist information that CPL has been researching and sharing with the public since 2022. In fact, The Federalist story has gone so viral that Snopes issued their typical fake ‘fact-check’ denying what is obviously true.
An earlier January 2023 story by Pullman explaining Minnesota’s pending new standards also referenced the work of both CPL and Center of the American Experiment. This was long before anyone anticipated that Tim Walz’s education plan would become a 2024 presidential election flashpoint.
Governor Walz’s Minnesota blueprint for transforming public schools into k-12 Marxist/Maoist programing centers will remain a flash point in the national political debate in the coming months. It will not quickly fade from the public square because it reflects the Marxist indoctrination that drove stunned parents nationwide to confront their local school boards. When COVID school closures brought curriculum directly into their homes, parents were shocked to learn that Johnny was being taught to be ashamed he is white, and that “inclusion” required him to read sexually perverse books.
This issue has significant presidential campaign ramifications!
As Pullman points out, Tim Walz’s education plan mandates teachers to:
- “affirm” and teach “white supremacy” and “systemic racism”;
- affirm and teach “intersectionality” such as ones’ “race” and “gender identities”;
- place each child into either an “oppressed” or “oppressor” identity group;
- affirm social “equity” (equal outcomes) and denigrate merit; and
- teach children to become “agents of social change to promote equity.”
The new Minnesota Marxist teacher licensing standards do in fact force Christians, Jews, and Muslims to either adopt heresies to their faith, or be denied a teaching license in Minnesota (War on Christians). They are in a lose/lose situation.
It’s not only Tim Walz’s teacher licensing requirements that demand affirmation and demonstration of Marxist ideologies in the classroom. The Professional Educators Licensing & Standards Board (PELSB), all Tim Walz appointees, also commissioned a rewrite of Minnesota history standards which embed the same radical ideologies. He also signed into law, a new PELSB-drafted Ethnic Studies requirement which Stanley Kurtz, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center, described as “race based neo-Marxism.” He said the requirements are “stealth critical race theory” and the “worst” education standards in the country.
Tim Walz has saturated Minnesota schools with Marxist dogmas through licensing requirements for teachers and through curriculum content standards for students. Dr. James Lindsay describes this as the Marxification of Education.
While Tim Walz forged ahead with his Marxification of education, Minnesota’s reading and math outcomes plummeted. The dramatic declines began in 2019, long before his draconian Covid lockdowns and extended school closings…and as he was pouring buckets of money into the public education cabal.
Governor Walz wants to be seen as a regular, folksy, teacher and coach, someone you would trust to instruct your child. But he is not your average next-door neighbor. CPL has long identified him as a skilled and well-trained Marxist. But the sudden national attention has revealed even more troubling revelations about his deep fondness for Chinese Communism.
The Washington Free Beacon reports in “Walz Praised Chinese Communism as a System Where ‘Everyone Shares”:
“It means that everyone is the same and everyone shares,” Walz said during a lesson on China’s communist system in November 1991. “The doctor and the construction worker make the same. The Chinese government and the place they work for provide housing and 14 kg or about 30 pounds of rice per month. They get food and housing.”
Should Walz attain the office of Vice President, America would have a Communist China sympathizer a heartbeat away from the Presidency. South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem said during an interview last weekend that she is “100% convinced Tim Walz is a national security risk.”
U.S. Congressman James Comer, Chairman of the House Oversight Committee, has launched an investigation into Tim Walz’s “possible CCP [Chinese Communist Party] influence in his decision-making as governor — and should he be elected, as Vice President.”
Tim Walz is an arrogant elitist too. He referred to areas of Minnesota outside the deep blue cities as “just rocks and cows.” In an early August interview, he dismissed criticism of his socialism with the comment, “One person’s socialism is another person’s neighborliness.”
Tim Walz is transforming education into something unrecognizable. Marxism is an atheistic ideology denying truth, the existence of God, and the laws of God. Marxists abhor the genuine faith, the traditional family, individual merit, and personal responsibility. Marxists do not believe our individual rights are inalienable and from God but are allocated and granted to us by the ruling elites. Marxist have always had one primary goal in mind – revolution.
Do Not Be Fooled! Marxists are experts at linguistic theft, dishonesty, and the manipulation of language. Pay attention to Minnesota, because Tim Walz’s actions speak louder than his words. His actions demonstrate what he has planned for the entire country.
Show Comments
1 thought on “Presidential Politics & Minnesota’s Marxist Teacher Licensing Rules”
- dav i would like more proof on this Reply
San Francisco Shooting Highlights Kamala’s Policies
Leave a Comment / By John & Andy Schlafly / September 4, 2024
In broad daylight, the first-round draft pick of the San Francisco 49ers was shot in the chest Saturday afternoon by a teenage thief, and the star’s first words were “Am I gonna die?” Wide receiver Ricky Pearsall had been walking alone on a sidewalk near Union Square when a 17-year-old with a gun tried to steal his Rolex watch.
Once a fashionable shopping area like Fifth Avenue in Manhattan, Union Square has become seedy as Macy’s, Nordstrom, and many other stores, boutiques, and restaurants have closed there. Pearsall was shopping after an autograph signing at the Cow Palace.
Video showed blood covering his upper body while he was helped into an ambulance. His mother subsequently posted on Facebook that the bullet miraculously missed vital organs and exited his body, declaring that “God shielded him.”
San Francisco authorities were immediately lenient to the shooter, concealing his identity and declaring that he would be charged merely in juvenile court. But it has been posted on X that he is a gang member who was caught with an illegal gun merely days earlier, and then released by California authorities.
Teenagers who commit even murders in California are typically back on the streets within a few years of becoming adults. By charging them only as juveniles, as this assailant will be, officials make them eligible for release in the near future.
Welcome to San Francisco, the once-golden city that has been ruined by the liberal policies of Kamala Harris, Gavin Newsom, and other Democrats. Rampant street crime, homelessness, and people defecating on public sidewalks have repelled so many tourists and conventions that the largest hotels in the city have been abandoned by their owners.
America has never elected a San Francisco liberal as president, and should not start now with Kamala Harris. In the second quarter of this year, office vacancy in San Francisco rose to a record 37%, which means that more than a third of the commercial space is empty.
Kamala Harris was the district attorney for San Francisco for seven years, and then the Attorney General for California for six years after that. Her statewide office was favorable towards two soft-on-crime ballot initiatives, Proposition 47 and 57, over opposition by police unions to the latter.
As the San Francisco District Attorney, Harris refused to seek the death penalty for the murder of police Officer Isaac Espinoza in 2004, despite how many Democrats including former San Francisco Mayor Dianne Feinstein stated that capital punishment was warranted by the special circumstances of that case. Harris announced her decision of leniency for the cop-killer merely three days after the brutal murder of Officer Espinoza, before he was even buried and without speaking first to his widow.
The shocking murder of Officer Espinoza left their 3-year-old baby girl without a father. He had honorably served eight years with the San Francisco Police Department before he was gunned down in cold blood.
The president of the San Francisco Police Officers Association criticized Harris in an interview with CNN in 2019, questioning why she ruled out the death penalty so quickly. “What would her motives be to do this so soon after the death?” he asked, implying Harris’s political agenda.
Nicole Shanahan, the San Franciscan running mate of RFK Jr. who recently endorsed Trump, tweeted on Saturday that “crime here is spiraling out of control. People are nervous to walk downtown—even in broad daylight.”
“We’ve got tech execs getting stabbed to death, an NFL first-rounder shot while shopping, and routine robberies, vehicle break-ins, and violent crime turning SF into a nightmare for families. Anyone claiming all is well is lying to you,” she added.
Yet this is where Kamala Harris was the top prosecutor when she sought prison sentences for petty marijuana violations while letting violent criminals go free. The epidemic of crime in San Francisco is the result of her policies, which have been continued by other liberals.
Shanahan has become a vocal California critic of Democrats, posting on her account highly effective videos against Kamala Harris. After she and RFK Jr. suspended their candidacy in favor of Trump, she observed that “Democrats spent millions on lawsuits to keep us off the ballots in states across the country.”
“Now that we’ve suspended our campaign, they’re scrambling to keep us on the ballot. This is a party that truly believes in controlling the American voter and does not trust Americans to choose freely at the ballot box.”
San Francisco is ranked as the worst-run city in the United States, according to researchers at WalletHub. Photographs of the rampant vagrancy and maps of store closures there leave little doubt that it deserves this ignominious ranking.
This results from the liberal ideology that Democrats attempt to impose nationwide, with Kamala Harris. Americans should decline to put this in the White House.
John and Andy Schlafly are sons of Phyllis Schlafly (1924-2016) and lead the continuing Phyllis Schlafly Eagles organizations with writing and policy work.
Show Comments
With Harvard “Queering Education” Class, Gender “Cult” Powers On
3 Comments / By Alex Newman / September 4, 2024
The cult of queer is getting stronger. As tens of millions of American children struggle with reading and millions more deal with sex abuse at the hands of “educators,” Harvard University’s Graduate School of Education will teach future teachers how to combat the alleged evils of “heteronormativity” and “cisnormativity” in the classroom. Seriously.
In a Spring course called “Queering Education,” Harvard instructor of “Education” Kimm Topping, who uses the plural pronouns “they/them,” will explore “the role of gender and sexuality in shaping young people’s schooling experiences, opportunities, and outcomes.” She will also address how schools shape students’ “notions of gender and sexuality.”
Dr. James Lindsay, co-author of the best-selling new book “The Queering of the American Child: How a New School Religious Cult Poisons the Minds and Bodies of Normal Kids,” has been warning of the dangers of this “cult” for years. This Harvard course, he warned, aims to embed the cult’s ideas into everything to help recruit drastically more children.
“’Queering education’ is, frankly, the effort of turning education into programming for a cult that is based on (and obsessed with) sex particularly as a delivery mechanism for children,” Dr. Lindsay, also an expert on the Marxification of American education, told The Newman Report in a statement.
“Under the guise of words like ‘building positive, nurturing environments,’ the goal is to transform educational spaces and programs into opportunities to ‘affirm’ Queer cult beliefs and behaviors and shut out anything the cult disagrees with,” he continued. “It’s shocking but not surprising Harvard would be offering this course.”
The course description almost sounds like a parody of “queer” indoctrination programs. “In many ways, the course is about the ‘hidden curriculum’ of heteronormativity and cisnormativity, or the subtle practices in schools that privilege heterosexual, gendered identities and ways of being,” the description states.
It continues, “As such, students in the course will apply the concept of the hidden curriculum to the study of gender and schooling in order to understand why and how children and youth with different gender identities experience schooling differently and why and how heteronormative schooling detrimentally impacts all students.”
Breaking down what that means, Dr. Lindsay warned of major dangers ahead for victims of this sort of indoctrination. “While the entire course description is alarming, the secret sauce lies inside the description’s claim that ‘heteronormativity’ and ‘cisnormativity’ define a ‘hidden curriculum’ in education that needs to be transformed (‘queered’),” he said.
“This notion of a ‘hidden curriculum’ is meant to describe that which is deliberately taught but not explicitly taught as part of the stated curriculum,” added Dr. Lindsay. “The concern is that the ‘hidden curriculum’ does the real heavy lifting of socializing (that is, brainwashing) students to conform to society and to be straight and not to attempt transition.”
“The objective from the Queer Pedagogy perspective is to therefore both to embed Queer Theory-based content inside the explicit curriculum and to make a Queer Theory-based environment the ‘hidden curriculum’ that socializes students into their destructive activist cult that damages children mentally, socially, and eventually physically in profound ways,” he concluded.
The lecturer for the Harvard course, a self-styled “community organizer,” is a longtime activist promoting homosexuality and gender confusion, according to her biography on Harvard’s website. Among other accomplishments, Topping boasts of having created the first “Gay-Straight Alliance” in her town as well as founding “Lavender Education.”
By the time students finish her course, they will be expected to “talk comfortably about queer history and how it can inform our understanding of schools and schooling,” the description continues, as if government-school “educators” across the nation were not already indoctrinating children on “queerness.”
Those taking the course must also “identify specific strategies that educators at various levels might use to support students in negotiating gender and sexuality norms,” “identify tools that schools can use to build positive, nurturing environments, which open up possibilities for complex gender and sexual identity development,” and more.
The course begins by offering “theoretical and historical grounding” before going on to explore “where there is possibility for change,” the description states. It will also provide an intersectional focus by considering ways that “other elements of identity” such as race and socioeconomic status “intersect with gender and sexuality.”
Aside from the horrific damage this sort of abuse masquerading as education will do to children, perhaps the most tragic part of this is that it is happening at a university established by Christians for the propagation of the Gospel. At one time, Harvard had a very different understanding of the real purpose of education — and was not afraid to say it.
“Let every student be plainly instructed, and earnestly pressed to consider well, the main end of his life and studies is to know God and Jesus Christ which is eternal life (John 17:3), and therefore to lay Christ in the bottom, as the only foundation of all sound knowledge and learning,” the school’s original Rules and Precepts declared.
The Takeaway:
Taxpayer funding is the only way this sort of cult movement can even exist, much less flourish. It is past time for Americans’ elected representatives to stop the flow of public money to all of this — from the cult recruitment efforts at universities to the K-12 indoctrination centers. Only then can society be rebuilt from the destruction on a solid foundation.
Show Comments
3 thoughts on “With Harvard “Queering Education” Class, Gender “Cult” Powers On”
- Pepe Chicago Straight from Satan. You capture the kids by destroying their love if God. The proof is all around us. Just look around…
https://youtu.be/fdzW-S8MwbI?si=Nn_0Cwbtmxl_AAVS Reply - Alex Kouskolekas Is there anything with Harvard’s grad school that talks about teachers teaching the subjects they were hired to teach? You know, those quaint things like reading, writing, math, actual history, and some basic science. The country has enough barely literate high school graduates as it is. Reply
- mike goodpaster Check out the Antonio Gramsci article by Fr. James Thornton in past issue of the New American for context. Reply
How to Stop Fraud BEFORE ’24 Election With True The Vote’s Engelbrecht
Leave a Comment / By Liberty Sentinel Staff / September 3, 2024
There is still time to do what must be done to protect the integrity of the 2024 election, but the clock is ticking, warned True The Vote Founder Catherine Engelbrecht on The Liberty Report with Alex Newman on Patriot TV.
Throughout the extended interview, Engelbrecht offers riveting information on the dangers facing America’s elections. One of the most significant: illegal immigrant voters and registrations.
Still, Engelbrecht sounded hopeful about securing a free and fair election for Trump. And she offered easy steps that voters must take to avoid another 202-style disaster.
Watch the full interview here:
Show Comments
“Climate”-Friendly Olympics Show Horror of Pritzker-style Policies
1 Comment / By Alex Newman / September 3, 2024
Every four years, the best athletes on the planet compete against one another while the watching world marvels at their physical prowess in the Summer Olympics. This year, however, in addition to bizarre and blasphemous rituals, humanity got to see the idiocy behind attempts to mitigate “climate change” — attempts very similar to those routinely mandated by Governor J.B. Pritzker in Illinois — in full bloom.
Months before the games began, Paris 2024 announced its ambitious plan to “halve the carbon footprint” from the past two Olympics and host the “greenest ever Games,” as if carbon dioxide (the gas of life) were somehow not “green.” Organizers admitted the approach was a “radical departure from that of previous major sports events.”
As it turned out, many of the athletes competing in the games weren’t too fond of the more “climate friendly” measures. Organizers celebrated their supposedly planet-rescuing schemes in endless “news” articles boasting of everything from doubling the amount of “plant-based foods” to the use of “recycled materials” in the Athletes’ Village.
Speaking out on social media and in the press, scores of athletes bemoaned the cardboard mattresses, the lack of air-conditioning, and the infamously inadequate nutrition. Private chefs had to be brought in at the eleventh hour. And huge amounts of real food — meat, eggs, and other hearty meals required by athletes — had to be rustled up on short notice to supplement what organizers described as the “climate-conscious menu.”
Following a near-mutiny by athletes, organizers finally caved and brought in real food. “There has been a reinforcement in animal proteins, with 700 kilos of eggs and a ton of meat, to meet the demands of the athletes, who we place at the heart of the Paris 2024 experience,” said Paris Olympics CEO Etienne Thobois in a statement as bad publicity grew.
But it was not just the lack of food that athletes found intolerable. The Team USA gymnastics team added their own mattress toppers to the so-called “sustainable” beds, which gold-medalist Simone Biles said “suck.” A photo of Italian swimmer Thomas Ceccon, napping outside in a public park went viral. Ceccon, a Gold-medalist and world record holder, contends that the poor sleeping conditions hurt his performance.
Faced with inadequate “geothermal cooling” systems, numerous teams including those from Canada, Japan, Germany, Italy, Britain, and the United States were forced to purchase portable air-conditioning units to deal with the summer heat, according to news reports. Apparently struggling to sleep in the heat is not conducive to athletic performance.
Naturally, the A/C purchases by some led to accusations of unfair advantage and “privilege” for wealthier nations from teams that could not afford to do the same. Climate warriors and social-justice zealots, meanwhile, complained that this was fueling “inequality” in the games.
Unable to deal with the Third World conditions, many athletes simply left the Village altogether to find better accommodations elsewhere. Nobody seems to be asking the obvious question: If Olympic athletes in peak shape couldn’t stand the living conditions in Paris for a few weeks, should anyone expect the average American to fare any better?
Of course, as those following the “climate” agenda know well, the standard of living for people around the world comes second to “saving” the planet, at least as far as enviro-globalists are concerned. Many show much more concern for the “environment” than for the health and welfare of people currently alive today.
For wealthy nations, “climate” policies may result in extreme discomfort and more poverty, as the Olympics foolishness showed clearly. But for those in poorer countries — many of whom live on the edge with barely enough food and energy to survive — it can be a matter of life and death.
As former NASA senior climate scientist Dr. Roy Spencer put it, policies pursued by these globalist “climate Nazis” literally threaten the lives of millions of people. Ironically, the “carbon footprint” of many of the globalists behind it — Bill Gates, Michael Bloomberg, Al Gore, Leonardo di Caprio, and countless more — approaches that of small African nations.
No one exemplifies the hypocrisy and lack of concern for the poor better than billionaire Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker, a champion of radical “climate change” policies since he took office. Most notably, the 2021 Climate and Equitable Jobs Act (CEJA) mandates that the state convert to 100 percent “clean energy” by 2050, a scheme that will force electricity prices even higher.
Interestingly, many advocates of these sorts of policies actually admit that their policies will result in higher costs for consumers. As then-U.S. Senator Barack Obama of Illinois told the San Francisco Chronicle while campaigning for the presidency, “Under my plan of a cap-and-trade system, electricity rates would necessarily skyrocket.” Indeed.
In July, while the Olympians were sweating in their cardboard beds, Gov. Pritzker signed a bill establishing a regulatory framework for “carbon capture and sequestration.” The governor boasted about how the Prairie State would continue “leading the charge in the fight against climate change.”
For the embattled taxpayers and workers of Illinois, that all means higher costs, less jobs, less manufacturing, and even lower living standards for everyone but the government cronies profiting from it all. Meanwhile, as U.S. and Illinois officials decimate the economy under the guise saving the “climate,” Communist China continues to build coal-fired power plants at breakneck speed.
It must be understood that the misery imposed on Olympians and Illinoisans alike is based on a fraud of historic proportions. The notion that carbon dioxide is pollution is preposterous. It is the gas of life, exhaled by people and required by plants for life-sustaining photosynthesis.
On top of that, even if CO2 were a dangerous “greenhouse gas,” all agree that human emissions of CO2 represent a fraction of 1 percent of the “greenhouse gases” present naturally in the atmosphere — literally. As Trump’s climate advisor Dr. William Happer of Princeton told me in several interviews, Earth is “starving” for CO2.
Just like so many Olympic athletes this year, the people of Illinois and the world must resist and reject government efforts to enforce misery, scarcity, and lower living standards under the guise of “saving the climate.” The whole proposition is absurd. And it will do less than nothing to help the environment.
Support Homeschooling, Support Classical Conversations by Clicking Below:
Show Comments
1 thought on ““Climate”-Friendly Olympics Show Horror of Pritzker-style Policies”
- Adrian Roman Bad is good, wrong is right, up is down, and anyone who says different will be subject to severe penalties. Eight grade biology were we learn about the difference between a human being with a prostate and one with Fallopian tubes and a uterus, is verboten! The delusional and indoctrinated people who want to burn everything down to build a “new world” don’t think about it long enough to realize that they will perish as well in the torture of their own flames. They’re three year olds playing with matches. Reply
Kamala says quiet part out loud: Government ‘oversight’ needed to police the internet and rein in thought crimes
2 Comments / By Leo Hohmann / September 3, 2024
The global crackdown on free speech continues unabated and if you think it’s relegated to countries like China, Cuba and North Korea, think again.
A Brazilian Supreme Court panel on Monday upheld a decision to suspend Elon Musk’s social media platform X in the country.
Last Friday, Justice Alexandre de Moraes ordered the platform blocked.
Since the decision, Musk and his supporters have tried to paint de Moraes as a renegade and an authoritarian censor of political speech. But Brazil is no outlier. The European Union is also cracking down on free speech with its Online Service Act and we have our own free-speech haters here in the United States.
In fact, one of them is a candidate for president.
Kamala Harris came out in 2019 and admitted in the wide open that she wants to see the same type of state-sponsored censorship implemented in the United States as what we now see taking shape in Brazil.
The government, Harris believes, should have ultimate control over what you and I are allowed to post on the internet, as well as more control over what we are allowed to see and hear. She doesn’t trust us to decide for ourselves as to the truth or accuracy of what we see or read online.
Take a look at the video below and let the gravity of what Harris is advocating sink in for a moment.
So, she’s very impressed with the socialist government of Brazil’s legal action to shut down Twitter, now called X.
She’s telling us that social media platforms, which are where most people get their news today, are “directly speaking to millions of people without any level of oversight or regulation, and that has to stop.”
That means, in her view, all voices must be sifted through a filter. The question becomes, who should we allow to be the official filter of news and information? Who should be allowed to be the overseer? I think Kamala is pretty clear on that. It’s the government. And that is as anti-American and unconstitutional as you can get.
But it’s not just Kamala Harris who thinks this way. This is the majority viewpoint among the self-apointed globalist elites worldwide.
Robert Reich, the former secretary of the U.S. Department of Labor under Bill Clinton, said in an August 30th op-ed for The Guardian that Elon Musk should be dealt with harshly for his commitment to free speech on his X platform, which Reich described as “out of control.”
Reich listed six things that can be done to “rein him in,” and one of them was for governments around the world to “threaten Musk with arrest if he doesn’t stop disseminating lies and hate on X.” He cited France’s arrest of Telegram CEO Pavel Durov last week as the model for what should be done to Musk and anyone else who dares to question the official globalist narratives on key issues such as vaccines, LGBTQ issues, certain election results, NATO’s wars of aggression, etc.
Current Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a July 2 statement that his department is working to create a program run by AI that will scan the internet looking for posts that counter the government’s official narratives (he calls it disinformation) and then somehow punish or marginalize the authors of the unauthorized remarks.
Fast-forward to the 3-minute mark and watch through the 7:07 mark to hear Blinken speak boldly of his anti-free speech, anti-First Amendment vision for America. He admits this vision originates with the United Nations. https://www.youtube.com/embed/zTsEHrwDR4c?si=hBliG6CEetG0ZVe0
Only outright communists and techno-tyrants would admit to supporting such authoritarian ideas and concepts.
Unfortunately, that’s what today’s puppet politicians have become as they continue to shill for the globalists at the World Economic Forum and United Nations. Both the WEF and UN are in the midst of a global campaign to wipe out all voices of dissent and redefine them as criminals. The regimes in China, North Korea, Iran and Cuba have never allowed people to speak critically of government authorities so nothing is changing there. It’s the Western so-called “democracies” that are in the crosshairs of this global campaign.
Will you submit to this beast system? Or will you double down on courage and speak truth to power, submitting only to the higher authority of God and His Son, Jesus Christ?
Show Comments
2 thoughts on “Kamala says quiet part out loud: Government ‘oversight’ needed to police the internet and rein in thought crimes”
- Frank Information the government doesn’t like or doesn’t want known, is not misinformation, disinformation, hate speech or any other buzzwords they use to describe it. The truth of the matter is a majority of the misinformation and disinformation these days comes from our government and their MSM mouthpieces. And most of the hate is directed towards conservatives, Trump supporters, patriots, veterans, white men, firearms owners, Christians, law abiding dissidents etc Reply
- RendertoCaesar Censorship is Big Brother right out of 1984. I always thought that something was not right from the 1976 election to the present day, with Walter Cronkite, Huntley, Brinkley, to today’s media host actors telling us what the mockingbird project wants us to hear. Resist Censorship Reply
Veritas Vox – 112 | Educating Your Children in a Post-Christian World
Leave a Comment / By Liberty Sentinel Staff / September 3, 2024
Did you know that public education in America is rooted in a movement to undermine Christianity? In this eye-opening episode, we talk with journalist and CEO of Liberty Sentinel Media, Alex Newman, about the history and current state of education in the United States.
Discover how government-run schools originated, the problems with modern public education, and why Alex believes classical Christian education is the gold standard for raising the next generation. Alex shares insights from his book Indoctrinating Our Children to Death and discusses the potential risks and benefits of state-run school choice initiatives.
Watch the full interview here:
Show Comments
Behind the Deep State: Is the Next Pandemic Here or Coming Soon? How to Respond
Leave a Comment / By Liberty Sentinel Staff / August 31, 2024
The same forces behind Covid tyranny are getting ready to do it again, but humanity and the medical profession must resist, explains Global Health Project co-founder Dr. Kat Lindley in this interview with The New American magazine’s Alex Newman. Whether it’s monkeypox or bird flu or “disease X,” Dr. Lindley is not concerned about the health side. Rather, she is concerned about efforts to control humanity and the escalating push to deploy endless mRNA products. Thankfully, there is a lot people can do to prepare and push back, from taking better care of their health to getting involved.
Article by Liberty Sentinel Staff
