Biden Being Urged To Create “Reality Czar” & “Ministry Of Truth” Right Out Of George Orwell’s 1984
It hasn’t taken long at all for the man with misfiring brain cells to accelerate, exponentially, the move toward a dystopian future for the united States using dictatorial authoritarian edicts under the color of executive orders. From declaring over half the country’s population “domestic terrorists” to eradicating the US borders allowing unfettered illegal alien invaders entry to erecting a permanent wall around the capitol building complexes for the protection of corrupt criminals occupying the space, this two brain cell misfiring man received encouragement from The New York Times to create a “ministry of truth” with a “reality czar” as its head.
Keep in mind we are being heavily censored, please follow us on our social media pages: Telegram USA.Life, Gab, Parler, Minds, Spreely, MeWe, Twitter, Facebook
Blacklisted News reported the story from Summit.News.
The New York Times has amplified claims by “experts” who are calling for Joe Biden to appoint a “reality czar,” prompting critics to compare the idea to the Ministry of Truth in George Orwell’s 1984.
In an article entitled ‘How the Biden Administration Can Help Solve Our Reality Crisis’, the NYT’s Kevin Roose cites “experts” who are calling on “the Biden administration put together a cross-agency task force to tackle disinformation and domestic extremism, which would be led by something like a “reality czar.”
The job of this “reality czar” would be to head up “a centralized task force could coordinate a single, strategic response” to things like COVID-related and election fraud “conspiracy theories.”
“This task force could also meet regularly with tech platforms, and push for structural changes that could help those companies tackle their own extremism and misinformation problems. (For example, it could formulate “safe harbor” exemptions that would allow platforms to share data about QAnon and other conspiracy theory communities with researchers and government agencies without running afoul of privacy laws.) And it could become the tip of the spear for the federal government’s response to the reality crisis,” states the article.
“Ah, the Ministry of Truth. I’ve been waiting for this one,” responded Raheem Kassam.
If you haven’t read George Orwell‘s book, 1984, it is a “must read” to understand where this country is headed. One would think Orwell’s book is being used as a “playbook” for societal transformation with a dose of The Matrix trilogy thrown in for good measure.
In the book, the Ministry of Truth decides what is “truth” in Oceania no matter what the actual truth may be, and exercises this monopoly over reality by falsifying the nature of historical events.
The Ministry of Truth also uses this power monopoly to redefine the very word “truth” under the rubric of Newspeak, so “truth” becomes whatever the government-approved version of events is in that moment.
What the “experts” cited by the New York Times are calling far and what Orwell portrayed in his book are so similar, even Kevin Roose admits, “It sounds a little dystopian.”
But if “conspiracy theories” really do pose a deadly threat to society, who is responsible for pushing the most egregious disinformation?
As we have exhaustively documented – the most harmful “conspiracy theories,” – such as Saddam Hussein’s non-existent WMD’s and supporting “freedom fighters” who were actually jihadists in Libya and Syria – are always exclusively peddled by the mainstream media.
The corporate press pushing these two whoppers created the consensus for war that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people and an international migrant crisis.
The New York Times was one of the most prominent outlets that amplified both these damaging deceptions and yet they faced no consequences whatsoever.
Important to remember, also, is a government creation of this nature would certainly target the alternative news media platforms and journalists who conduct in-depth research to find the facts and truth in order to bring it to those who have realized the lamestream government controlled propaganda entertainment enemedia brainwashes the masses while engaging in vitriol. The LGCPEE is a master of reality distortion. Despite thinking the LGCPEE would be targeted under this “ministry of truth”, it would not because it peddles the “government narrative”, essentially being the lapdog propaganda outlets these entities already are. However, alternative media platforms would be “disappeared” from the internet where many are located; access would be near impossible, if not totally impossible.
Under the “new” definition of the word “truth”, these outlets would peddle and push the government narrative and therefore, be exempt from removal. It’s the same with the current social media platforms. Certain social media platforms are eager to work with government in order to censor citizens, acting more like a publisher instead of a platform. Anything posted on these “platform publishers” would be censored and reported to the “ministry” so that the individual conveying the truth can be “corrected”. But, under the broad umbrella of censorship will be the limiting of access to information that would expose the truth.
There will be only one side to the issue – the government side. Everything else will be labeled as “conspiracy theory”, disinformation, lies, and delusions. It will trample free speech further to prevent an open debate using an exchange of ideas and information. Severe consequences would await those who do not abide by the “rules”.
This “begging” to create a “ministry of truth” to further brainwash and propagandize the population are not what freedom and free speech are in a free country. But, in case you missed it, this country is now a dictatorship where the current occupant of the people’s house is issuing “rule by decree” without so much as a whimper from Congress. Given a bit more time and there will be no freedom left. The rubber is meeting the road folks; and, there is no more time to kick it to the next generation to solve. Choose wisely the side on which you stand – the lawfulness or lawlessness. There will be consequences for either choice; but, you stand a better chance when choosing lawfulness and the rule of law, not man.
Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media