How Could Russia Buy 2016 For $100,000 When Bloomberg Couldn’t Buy 2020 For $700 Million?
A question you will never hear in the mainstream Dem-media. An answer they will never admit. The Democrats and their propagandists think the American people are dumb as rocks.
HEMINGWAY: IF BLOOMBERG COULDN’T BUY 2020, HOW COULD RUSSIA BUY 2016?
By: March 5, 2020 By The Federalist Staff
- Activate Your Own Stem Cells & Reverse The Aging Process - Choose "Select & Save" OR Join, Brand Partner & Select Silver To Get Wholesale Prices
- Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
- How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation
- Protect Your Income & Retirement Assets With Gold & Silver
- Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Get Free Shipping With Promo Code TIM
Senior Editor Mollie Hemingway joined Fox News’ “Special Report” to discuss New York billionaire Mike Bloomberg’s historic level of campaign spending, and what it reveals about the power of media and establishment consensus.
Hemingway pointed out how Bloomberg’s failed campaign, despite unlimited resources, pokes holes in the popular narrative that Russia helped Donald Trump “steal” the 2016 election.
“WE HAD YEARS WHERE PEOPLE WERE SAYING A COUPLE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS IN BARELY LITERATE FACEBOOK ADS FROM RUSSIANS CAUSED DONALD TRUMP TO WIN. HERE YOU HAD A GUY SPEND NEARLY $1 BILLION AND HE WENT NOWHERE. IT’S A HUMILIATING DEFEAT FOR MICHAEL BLOOMBERG,” SHE SAID.
Host Bret Baier drilled the point home: “So Russians influenced the election with $200,000, or $300,000 in Facebook ads? And Mike Bloomberg couldn’t get more than 50 delegates with $600 million dollars?”
“And this hurts Bernie Sanders’s message, too, because he likes to say the billionaires control everything,” Hemingway said. “Clearly Bloomberg having all this money didn’t do as much for him as Biden having the media and the establishment behind him. I would pick media and establishment over millions all day.”
Article posted with permission from Pamela Geller