Media Contempt For A “Rich, White” President: Why The Press No Longer Cares About Credibility
Even when Donald Trump was running for president, it was pretty evident that the establishment press was biased against him. The reason for this is not hard to discern; Trump was appealing not only to a majority of Americans, but he was doing so with values and proposals that are antithetical to the radical leftist doctrine that has become orthodoxy in newsrooms.
There is simply no debating that the press remains vehemently opposed to President Trump, more so than they were opposed to candidate Trump. Even Politico reported on a 2016 Quinnipiac University poll revealing that during the campaign, 55 percent of likely voters surveyed said the media were biased against Trump.
Since Trump’s election, this bias has become even more palpable. During the Obama administration, we witnessed a press that was slavishly devoted to the president, dedicatedly shielding him from all criticism and furtively overlooking his many deficiencies. Now, we are being treated to the opposite side of the coin.
Because the press, as the single most powerful advocate for the radical left, is now expressing hatred (which the left does so well) rather than love, as they did with Barack Obama, their obsession is even more plain, their vitriol more potent and capacious. Professionalism, ethics, maturity and of course civility have all been cast to the wind. These days, the most prominent press operatives (network reporters covering the White House, for example) have become little more than smug, belligerent thugs.
To some observers, it is disgusting. To others, humorous. To some, it engenders pathos at a once-great bastion of free speech and bulwark against tyranny having given itself over to whoredom.
To still others, it is baffling: Much of the criticism being leveled by observers and pundits has to do with the press having lost credibility and being likely to lose even more if they continue to evidence such extreme bias. Those commenting are often perplexed as to how little value those in the press appear to place on their own credibility and how they could risk endangering it in this manner.
I’d like to put this argument to rest once and for all with the assertion that the question of credibility as it pertains to the press is wholly immaterial. Yes, the press has long since lost its credibility in the eyes of those who employ critical thinking and who viewed the press in its traditional role. This doesn’t matter to the press as a whole any longer, since credibility went hand-in-hand with the established mission of the press – at least as it was understood for 200 years.
Today, those who comprise the establishment media are not at all concerned with that mission. Over the last few decades, we have seen far-left ideologues insinuate themselves into every position and area therein, much in the same way they have insinuated themselves into other influential sectors of our society. It’s been a long-held stratagem of leftists since early in the last century.
Thus, such things as safeguarding liberty and holding institutions accountable are no longer even on the average journalist’s radar, let alone that of CNN’s Jim Acosta.
To be clear, this phenomenon did not come about during the Obama administration, nor because of Donald Trump’s election – it’s just that this generation of shameless leftist press operatives have come into their own during this period. Those who’ve recently criticized the press on the grounds of credibility also noticed that this expression of leftist bias has been incremental.
The single-minded devotion to political ideology on the part of the press is also the reason that advancing the leftist agenda trumps even financial solvency. For many years, we’ve seen major television news networks losing viewers and newspapers losing readers. Those in the press maintain that this is largely due to technology, but that’s a crock. The fact is that many news consumers saw the writing on the wall and didn’t care to be propagandized.
Those in the press know the truth too, and they know who their audience is. It is no longer the average news-consuming American, as it was 50 years ago. Now, their audience is the impressionable, those who don’t know that the press has become nothing but a megalithic propaganda bureau. Their mission is to keep the impressionable, the misinformed and true-believing rank-and-file leftists fired up.
This is why the intonations of the press have become so shrill. They simply don’t care about credibility anymore. Thus, criticizing them on this point is an exercise in futility.
As far as the press vendetta against President Trump goes, their beef is twofold. First, they know that Trump, his followers and their case against the Deep State represent the greatest existential threat the left has ever faced in America, so naturally, they’re going to go after the president with vigor.
Second: If you ask a leftist to succinctly identify the cause the nation’s pain, or even the world’s pain, you’re likely to get an answer along the lines of “rich, white people.” Well, this certainly makes the president an easy target, because there are few people richer and whiter than Donald Trump.
Article posted with permission from Erik Rush